| Revision as of 22:31, 2 December 2012 editRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators273,143 edits →December 2012: raise to uw-unsourced3← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:06, 3 December 2012 edit undoVoice of Clam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,240 edits Edit warring.Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ] Please stop adding ] content, as you did to ]. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> --] (]) 22:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC) | ] Please stop adding ] content, as you did to ]. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. If you continue to do so, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> --] (]) 22:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ===Edit warring=== | |||
| ::You have reverted this article five times now - more than enough to get you blocked. I won't block you this time, firstly because you're new and may not realise the seriousness of edit warring and secondly because I'm involved. However if you make one further revert without adding an independent source, I will raise the matter at the ]. <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #A00000;padding:1px;"> An ] on the ] </small> 00:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:06, 3 December 2012
December 2012
Hello, I'm Redrose64. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
When you put "the reference to the court order is shown in the notes", which notes are these? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at LMS Hughes Crab shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to LMS Hughes Crab. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring
- You have reverted this article five times now - more than enough to get you blocked. I won't block you this time, firstly because you're new and may not realise the seriousness of edit warring and secondly because I'm involved. However if you make one further revert without adding an independent source, I will raise the matter at the administrator's noticeboard. An optimist on the run! 00:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)