| Revision as of 09:01, 3 December 2012 editOne bot (talk | contribs)32,540 editsm Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:19, 3 December 2012 edit undoTill (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,759 edits Reverted to revision 525945017 by Riley Huntley: Requires administrative judgement and didn't give others a chance to opine. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''No Consensus''' per ]. The crickets they are a-chirpin' here. (]) ] (]) 09:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | |||
| :{{la|Albannach}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Albannach}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| Line 17: | Line 10: | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | ||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> | :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| *'''Weak Keep''': They have clearly performed in both the UK and the US, which would satisfy ] ] (]) 02:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC) | *'''Weak Keep''': They have clearly performed in both the UK and the US, which would satisfy ] ] (]) 02:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 16: | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | ||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> | :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | ||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> | :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>]</font> <font color=#0066FF>]</font>''' 00:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 3 December 2012
Albannach
- Albannach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BAND. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Probably falls short of being sufficiently significant for an encyclopedia article. I did find a few news items: The News Press, Seminole Chronicle, Virginian-Pilot. --Michig (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: They have clearly performed in both the UK and the US, which would satisfy WP:BAND#4 Faustus37 (talk) 02:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. on 22 November by Dthomsen8 Faustus37 (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Categories: