Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:54, 6 December 2012 view sourceNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,486 edits Clerk notes: note to Clerk← Previous edit Revision as of 00:21, 7 December 2012 view source Lord Roem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators10,811 edits Yohowithrum COI: request withdrawnNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}}

== Yohowithrum COI ==
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 18:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|RadioFan}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Yohowithrum}} , ''subject'
*{{userlinks|76.67.97.140}} , ''suspected sockpuppet''
*{{userlinks|Pburka}}
*{{userlinks|JamesBWatson}}
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. -->

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
*
*
*
*

;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
* , originally but that has continued
* have been met by
*
* ,
* , this was
* also deleted without comment

=== Statement by RadioFan===
User Yohowithrum has established a pattern of editing articles that he has a conflict of interest with articles involving a film he made (]), the article on the subject of that film (]), a contest the film was involved in (] and ]). It's hard not to see this editing activity as promotional in nature.

This editor has also created an autobiographical article twice (both were deleted after AFDs). This editor has been about his connection to these subjects, implying he is a neutral 3rd party when in fact this editor has identified himself as of ].

Additionally, it appears {{userlinks|76.67.97.140}} is being used as a sock-puppet account as well. Each of the above articles have been edited over several days time.

--] (]) 18:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

As the arbitrators weighing in feel this best handled through COIN and the newly placed block due to sock puppetry, I'm happy to go that way. Consider this withdrawl of the request for arbitration. I'll reopen should those other methods prove ineffective in resolving the issue.--] (]) 23:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=== Statement by JamesBWatson ===
I'm see that I am listed as "involved". As far as I can make out, my only connection is that I posted warning on conflict of interest. That was about three and a half weeks ago, and I don't remember the circumstances. I don't have time now to look further into it, but I will try to find time tomorrow to refresh my memory of the case, and if I have anything to add I will come back and do so. ] (]) 21:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I now see that I also deleted and salted an article that Yohowithrum had repeatedly created, in defiance of two AfDs that both led to "delete" decisions. I will certainly try to come back here tomorrow and comment, if this case is still open. ] (]) 21:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=== Statement by {Party 3} ===

=== Statement by uninvolved SPI clerk Dennis Brown ===
Yohowithrum has been blocked for two weeks, and BenjaminZacharias has been indefinitely blocked based on the CU evidence as well as the behavior that makes it obvious this editor was creating multiple accounts for the purpose of evading scrutiny. I made the determination and blocks. I have no opinion on the merits of this case. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 19:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=== Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
::'''Note to Clerk''': In view of RadioFan's comment above, this request can be closed as withdrawn. Thanks, ] (]) 23:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/4/0/0) ===
<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small>
*Arbitration is normally the very last stage in dispute resolution. It appears to me that you would get a lot better and faster help at ] or even ] as you suspect there is socking going on here. '''Decline''' as I don't think you're looking for something as long and complicated as an arbitration case here, which is what this page is for requesting. ] 19:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
**Speaking as a checkuser, not an arbitrator, I would call Yohowithrum {{confirmed}} to match the newly created account {{checkuser|1=BenjaminZacharias}}. Per common CU practice, no comment on the IP address. ] 19:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
*Decline. I would think the other venues listed above should be able to deal with this quite satisfactorily. --] (]) 21:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' ] (]) 21:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
*'''Decline''' per Courcelles and Elen of the Roads. It looks like the issue is being addressed and I suggest that the filing party can now withdraw this request. ] (]) 22:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:21, 7 December 2012

Requests for arbitration

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 10 January 2025
Shortcuts

About this page

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.


File an arbitration request


Guidance on participation and word limits

Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.

  • Motivation. Word limits are imposed to promote clarity and focus on the issues at hand and to ensure that arbitrators are able to fully take in submissions. Arbitrators must read a large volume of information across many matters in the course of their service on the Committee, so submissions that exceed word limits may be disregarded. For the sake of fairness and to discourage gamesmanship (i.e., to disincentivize "asking forgiveness rather than permission"), word limits are actively enforced.
  • In general. Most submissions to the Arbitration Committee (including statements in arbitration case requests and ARCAs and evidence submissions in arbitration cases) are limited to 500 words, plus 50 diffs. During the evidence phase of an accepted case, named parties are granted an automatic extension to 1000 words plus 100 diffs.
  • Sectioned discussion. To facilitate review by arbitrators, you should edit only in your own section. Address your submission to arbitrators, not to other participants. If you wish to rebut, clarify, or otherwise refer to another submission for the benefit of arbitrators, you may do so within your own section. (More information.)
  • Requesting an extension. You may request a word limit extension in your submission itself (using the {{@ArbComClerks}} template) or by emailing clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. In your request, you should briefly (in 1-2 sentences) include (a) why you need additional words and (b) a broad outline of what you hope to discuss in your extended submission. The Committee endeavors to act upon extension requests promptly and aims to offer flexibility where warranted.
    • Members of the Committee may also grant extensions when they ask direct questions to facilitate answers to those questions.
  • Refactoring statements. You should write carefully and concisely from the start. It is impermissible to rewrite a statement to shorten it after a significant amount of time has passed or after anyone has responded to it (see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines § Editing own comments), so it is often advisable to submit a brief initial statement to leave room to respond to other users if the need arises.
  • Sign submissions. In order for arbitrators and other participants to understand the order of submissions, sign your submission and each addition (using ~~~~).
  • Word limit violations. Submissions that exceed the word limit will generally be "hatted" (collapsed), and arbitrators may opt not to consider them.
  • Counting words. Words are counted on the rendered text (not wikitext) of the statement (i.e., the number of words that you would see by copy-pasting the page section containing your statement into a text editor or word count tool). This internal gadget may also be helpful.
  • Sanctions. Please note that members and clerks of the Committee may impose appropriate sanctions when necessary to promote the effective functioning of the arbitration process.

General guidance

  • This page is for statements, not discussion.
  • Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
  • Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
  • Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
  • After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
  • Declined case requests are logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.