Revision as of 23:54, 6 December 2012 view sourceNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,486 edits →Clerk notes: note to Clerk← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:21, 7 December 2012 view source Lord Roem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators10,811 edits →Yohowithrum COI: request withdrawnNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== Yohowithrum COI == | |||
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 18:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|RadioFan}}, ''filing party'' | |||
*{{userlinks|Yohowithrum}} , ''subject' | |||
*{{userlinks|76.67.97.140}} , ''suspected sockpuppet'' | |||
*{{userlinks|Pburka}} | |||
*{{userlinks|JamesBWatson}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | |||
* , originally but that has continued | |||
* have been met by | |||
* | |||
* , | |||
* , this was | |||
* also deleted without comment | |||
=== Statement by RadioFan=== | |||
User Yohowithrum has established a pattern of editing articles that he has a conflict of interest with articles involving a film he made (]), the article on the subject of that film (]), a contest the film was involved in (] and ]). It's hard not to see this editing activity as promotional in nature. | |||
This editor has also created an autobiographical article twice (both were deleted after AFDs). This editor has been about his connection to these subjects, implying he is a neutral 3rd party when in fact this editor has identified himself as of ]. | |||
Additionally, it appears {{userlinks|76.67.97.140}} is being used as a sock-puppet account as well. Each of the above articles have been edited over several days time. | |||
--] (]) 18:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
As the arbitrators weighing in feel this best handled through COIN and the newly placed block due to sock puppetry, I'm happy to go that way. Consider this withdrawl of the request for arbitration. I'll reopen should those other methods prove ineffective in resolving the issue.--] (]) 23:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by JamesBWatson === | |||
I'm see that I am listed as "involved". As far as I can make out, my only connection is that I posted warning on conflict of interest. That was about three and a half weeks ago, and I don't remember the circumstances. I don't have time now to look further into it, but I will try to find time tomorrow to refresh my memory of the case, and if I have anything to add I will come back and do so. ] (]) 21:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
I now see that I also deleted and salted an article that Yohowithrum had repeatedly created, in defiance of two AfDs that both led to "delete" decisions. I will certainly try to come back here tomorrow and comment, if this case is still open. ] (]) 21:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === | |||
=== Statement by uninvolved SPI clerk Dennis Brown === | |||
Yohowithrum has been blocked for two weeks, and BenjaminZacharias has been indefinitely blocked based on the CU evidence as well as the behavior that makes it obvious this editor was creating multiple accounts for the purpose of evading scrutiny. I made the determination and blocks. I have no opinion on the merits of this case. ] - ] ] <small><b>]</b></small> 19:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
::'''Note to Clerk''': In view of RadioFan's comment above, this request can be closed as withdrawn. Thanks, ] (]) 23:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/4/0/0) === | |||
<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
*Arbitration is normally the very last stage in dispute resolution. It appears to me that you would get a lot better and faster help at ] or even ] as you suspect there is socking going on here. '''Decline''' as I don't think you're looking for something as long and complicated as an arbitration case here, which is what this page is for requesting. ] 19:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
**Speaking as a checkuser, not an arbitrator, I would call Yohowithrum {{confirmed}} to match the newly created account {{checkuser|1=BenjaminZacharias}}. Per common CU practice, no comment on the IP address. ] 19:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
*Decline. I would think the other venues listed above should be able to deal with this quite satisfactorily. --] (]) 21:48, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline''' ] (]) 21:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline''' per Courcelles and Elen of the Roads. It looks like the issue is being addressed and I suggest that the filing party can now withdraw this request. ] (]) 22:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:21, 7 December 2012
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open casesCase name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 10 January 2025 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|