Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Empire of Brazil: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:46, 3 July 2012 editCristiano Tomás (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,420 edits →Possible section: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 20:28, 7 December 2012 edit undoLecen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,620 edits →Province sectionNext edit →
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


I was just looking at the template and reading the Portugues version of the Brasilian Empire article and I thought of a possible section to add to this template. I propose a section called origins, which would include articles like the Portugues Corte Transfer and Joao VI and the UK of P, B, and the A and how all this lead up to an independent Brazilian monarchy. Just a thought, thank you, ] (]) 01:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC) I was just looking at the template and reading the Portugues version of the Brasilian Empire article and I thought of a possible section to add to this template. I propose a section called origins, which would include articles like the Portugues Corte Transfer and Joao VI and the UK of P, B, and the A and how all this lead up to an independent Brazilian monarchy. Just a thought, thank you, ] (]) 01:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

== Province section ==
There are many sections about nobility people. But they were only a small part of the empire! Why was the province section removed? The territories that made up the empire are less important than some individuals??? ] (]) 20:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
:Is not about nobles, but about key people in the military (the commander-in-chief of each international war) and the key politicians (people regarded as the most important politicians in each decade of the Empire). --] (]) 20:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

So, you removed it again and destroyed navigation! . Still these people are individual, no war can be fought with leaders alone. The actual fighters were the people of Brazil! And they lived in the provinces. ] (]) 20:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
:Yeah, whatever. I can see that you are new here. I'd like to point out that you shouldn't, I repeat, should NOT create articles which are no more than a single and short phrase and that no one will ever turn into a full article. --] (]) 20:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:28, 7 December 2012

WikiProject iconBrazil Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Emperor John I/VI

Would he not be an emperor recognized by Brazilian law, for the Treaty of Rio de Janeiro is a law-binding treaty ratified by both Brazil and Portugal, making Joao VI emperor Joao I. Now he was only titular, but it is nonetheless legal. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

First, he was never called "John I". Second, international treaties are not above a country's constitution, Third, the entire idea behind this template is to have key articles to understand the imperial era in Brazil. There are many, many key historical figures who were left out, such as regent Antônio Diogo Feijó, Conservative founder Bernardo Pereira de Vasconcelos, Conservative leader Viscount of Itaboraí, Liberal founder and leader Cristiano Otoni, etc... King João VI was a key figure in the late Brazilian colonial history, not Imperial history. --Lecen (talk) 11:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Alright, thank you, sorry for the disruption. Obrigado, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Don't worry, Cristiano. You were only trying to help. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 00:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Possible section

I was just looking at the template and reading the Portugues version of the Brasilian Empire article and I thought of a possible section to add to this template. I propose a section called origins, which would include articles like the Portugues Corte Transfer and Joao VI and the UK of P, B, and the A and how all this lead up to an independent Brazilian monarchy. Just a thought, thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Province section

There are many sections about nobility people. But they were only a small part of the empire! Why was the province section removed? The territories that made up the empire are less important than some individuals??? LatinoLatino (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Is not about nobles, but about key people in the military (the commander-in-chief of each international war) and the key politicians (people regarded as the most important politicians in each decade of the Empire). --Lecen (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

So, you removed it again and destroyed navigation! . Still these people are individual, no war can be fought with leaders alone. The actual fighters were the people of Brazil! And they lived in the provinces. LatinoLatino (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, whatever. I can see that you are new here. I'd like to point out that you shouldn't, I repeat, should NOT create articles which are no more than a single and short phrase and that no one will ever turn into a full article. --Lecen (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
Template talk:Empire of Brazil: Difference between revisions Add topic