Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:45, 7 December 2012 editCambalachero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,976 edits LatinoLatino: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:07, 7 December 2012 edit undoLecen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,620 edits LatinoLatino: reNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


Or you can risk scaring him away. It's your choice. This was just a word of advise, you can take or not, as you want. ] (]) 20:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC) Or you can risk scaring him away. It's your choice. This was just a word of advise, you can take or not, as you want. ] (]) 20:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
:I didn't ask him to be blocked. I asked someone else to do something about it. When the is a dispute about content the correct way to behave is to leave the article as it was before the disputed edit. Since he is willing to engage in an edit war, and I'm not, I won't waste time with him any longer. And no, he isn't helping. He is clearly not improving, expanding or fixing any article. He is creati9ng a bunch of unnecessary articles that have no room to be expanded. --] (]) 21:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:07, 7 December 2012

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.


Archives (Index)


Brazilliam monarchs

I didn't bold the English versions, but rather I italicized them. There's a differance & the latter is done on those example articles you gave me. GoodDay (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

LatinoLatino

One word of advise. There are very few editors working on articles related to Brazil (or South America, for that matter). There are even less editors working with the Empire of Brazil (you, Astynax, and I don't remember if anyone else). As a member of the Empire of Brazil task force, you should be aware of that. But now, there is a new user working on that topic. Don't you think you should be more gentle and welcoming towards him, rather than engage on discussions for such petty things? If he wants to add the provinces of the empire in the navbox, perhaps you should let him, after all it's not a very strange or uncommon thing to add. If you are semi-retired, the previous step from retiring, don't you think it would be a good idea to leave someone else working on the articles you have been working on, rather than have them rot the day you are no longer here?

Or you can risk scaring him away. It's your choice. This was just a word of advise, you can take or not, as you want. Cambalachero (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I didn't ask him to be blocked. I asked someone else to do something about it. When the is a dispute about content the correct way to behave is to leave the article as it was before the disputed edit. Since he is willing to engage in an edit war, and I'm not, I won't waste time with him any longer. And no, he isn't helping. He is clearly not improving, expanding or fixing any article. He is creati9ng a bunch of unnecessary articles that have no room to be expanded. --Lecen (talk) 21:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)