Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ngfan1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:58, 21 December 2012 editEvanh2008 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,675 edits December 2012: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 06:04, 21 December 2012 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,211 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on American Third Position Party. (TW)Next edit →
Line 160: Line 160:


] Thank you for ] to ]. Please make sure to include an ]. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ]&nbsp;<sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 05:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC) ] Thank you for ] to ]. Please make sure to include an ]. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ]&nbsp;<sup>(]&#124;])</sup> 05:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You've actually gone past 3RR now. And note that as it says, this is not an entitlement.'' ] (]) 06:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:04, 21 December 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Ngfan1! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sundown Mountain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sundown Mountain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited United States presidential election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitution Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ngfan1/Frank Fluckiger has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Frank Fluckiger, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Frank Fluckiger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

Sarah (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebekah Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Constitution Party of Tennessee

Hello, Ngfan1, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Constitution Party of Tennessee, appears to be directly copied from http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Constitution_Party_of_Minnesota. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Constitution Party of Tennessee if necessary.Template:Z120 MadmanBot (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Constitution Party of Delaware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Clayton
Constitution Party of Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lexington
Constitution Party of Maryland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rockville
Constitution Party of West Virgina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Daniels
Constitution Party of Wyoming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lovell
Daniel P. Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Republican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

American Party (1969)

Do you know for sure if the American Party is inactive? 130.64.178.145 (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Constitution Party of Florida

Hello, there is currently a discussion over the notability of this article (and perhaps other similar articles) you created. If you wish to discuss this matter, please do so at the article's talk page. RoyalMate1 02:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

American Third Position Party

Hello. Misplaced Pages's policy is that all information, especially if it is contentious or controversial must be supported by a link to a reliable source. In the information you are trying to add to this article, only the information on the presidential election is actually sourced at all, which is why I and another editor have been removing the rest of it. When another editor reverts your edit, the proper step to take is to discuss it on the article talk page, not to continue to try to undo the revert. (See WP:BRD). When you try to do this you are edit warring, which can lead to your being blocked from editing. Please do not attempt to reinsert the information with a citation from a reliable source. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry you cannot list candidates you ran on another party's ticket without presenting a source that says the candidate was representing the American Third Position. I have removed these two, you can restore them when you have those citations. Also there was no gubernatorial election in West Virgina in 2011. If you were referring to a primary of some sort, you'll need a source to support that as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
There was an election for governor in West Virginia in 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/West_Virginia_gubernatorial_special_election,_2011. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngfan1 (talkcontribs) 21:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I stand corrected. The reference was wrong though - I've fixed it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Evanh2008  05:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at American Third Position Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You've actually gone past 3RR now. And note that as it says, this is not an entitlement. Dougweller (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)