Misplaced Pages

User talk:TruthSeeker1234: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:13, 12 May 2006 editTom harrison (talk | contribs)Administrators47,534 edits Wikiquette← Previous edit Revision as of 06:43, 13 May 2006 edit undoMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits →Wikiquette: boilerplateNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


I don't think the Wikiquette page is usually used for dialogue, but I thought I should tell you that I have objected to your use of the edit summary to call my work vandalism. See ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:13, 12 May 2006 (UTC) I don't think the Wikiquette page is usually used for dialogue, but I thought I should tell you that I have objected to your use of the edit summary to call my work vandalism. See ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 18:13, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

== Last warning ==
See the definition of vandalism ]...if you refer to others edits as vandalism again and it doesn't conform with the definition, you will be blocked for disruption. ], ] are areas you need to review.--] 06:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:43, 13 May 2006

Welcome!

Hello, TruthSeeker1234, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  +Hexagon1 (talk) 03:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPA, WP:NOT, WP:NOR, WP:NLT

It's a good time for you to read WP:NPA...you have a problem with the message, then address that...do not attack the messanger. No vandalism has been committed either. There is a distinct difference from what you think is vandalism and what is actually efforts to ensure unencyclopedic and unproven allegations and original research out of article space. Furhtermore, no one here is mandated to reveal their true names...and your comments about submitting this to an "independent arbitration service" indicate to me that you could possibly be threatening legal action...an indefinitely blockable offense. There is zero proof of controlled demolition...what part of that do you not understand? I have yet to see you provide one ounce of proof of anything. Lastly, this is the discussion page for this article...we don't need to clutter up article space with a bunch of fact tags...they are ugly and unnecessary.--MONGO 15:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

3RR

I should point out that we have a three-revert rule that you may be violating. Tom Harrison 00:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

ST911 article

Hi TruthSeeker, Sorry to hear that you have given up on the collapse article, but I am interested in your proposed article on this for ST911. I'll be interested to read it (or lend any help, if you need) you might also be interested in the curious fact that Mongo works for Homeland Security . It highly likely that he is just an honest HS worker who likes to edit Misplaced Pages during lunch break, but it is a curious fact, given the US security services public declarations that they intend to 'control the new fronteers of cyberspace'. Seabhcán 10:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Published?

Where?...it'll be an interesting read...can you throw me a link if web based or let me know when I'll be in print?--MONGO 10:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Please let me know too. I really want to see this. SkeenaR 00:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikiquette

I don't think the Wikiquette page is usually used for dialogue, but I thought I should tell you that I have objected to your use of the edit summary to call my work vandalism. See Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette alerts#12 May 2006. Tom Harrison 18:13, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Last warning

See the definition of vandalism WP:VAN...if you refer to others edits as vandalism again and it doesn't conform with the definition, you will be blocked for disruption. WP:BLOCK, WP:CIVIL are areas you need to review.--MONGO 06:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)