Revision as of 18:45, 29 December 2012 editKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits →List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:57, 29 December 2012 edit undoGreen Parakeet (talk | contribs)150 edits →List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka ChopraNext edit → | ||
Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
General comment: this level of comment on a list usually indicates that the list is not ready for nomination, so we should consider a '''withdrawal''' until the list is ready for review. ] (]) 18:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | General comment: this level of comment on a list usually indicates that the list is not ready for nomination, so we should consider a '''withdrawal''' until the list is ready for review. ] (]) 18:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::I don't think so, your queries has been resolved. So, pls don't point fingers towards its nomination. I know it was a bit unready but know, its completely ready for passing FL.—] '''·''' <sup>]</sup> 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | ::::I don't think so, your queries has been resolved. So, pls don't point fingers towards its nomination. I know it was a bit unready but know, its completely ready for passing FL.—] '''·''' <sup>]</sup> 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
:'''Support''' This list meets the criteria for FL. It is Well-crafted and I don't see any issues with its prose or lead . Good work.] (]) 18:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:57, 29 December 2012
List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra
List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive3
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Pks1142 (talk) 04:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I am nominating the list for featured list candidate because Priyanka Chopra has won Several awards for her universally applauded performances. Chopra is one of the Best actresses of Indian cinema and a superstar too. There are very rare stars who can really act and she is undoubtedly one of them. Chopra's Awards and nominations list meets Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates criteria and after the peer review, It only got Better. I had worked hard on the list and It deserves to be a FLC.Pks1142 (talk) 04:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Quick comment:
Names of awards ceremonies with the name of the magazines in them should have the magazine title italicized. For example, "Cosmopolitan Fun Fearless Awards" should be "Cosmopolitan Fun Fearless Awards" and "GQ Men of The Year Awards" should be "GQ Men of The Year Awards".—WP:PENGUIN · 10:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- And in the section headers. —WP:PENGUIN · 13:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose on lead alone.
- Don't link common terms like "India" or "United States".
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "film debut with The Hero " -> "in The Hero"
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Andaaz" what's this? Mentioned in the lead but not linked or explained.
- Linked. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "several awards for" repeated, boring prose I'm afraid.
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "a Filmfare Award in "Best Villain" category. She also became second and last woman to win Filmfare Best Villain Award. " you link the award the second time, which is odd.
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- And you say "last" so you mean the category is now defunct? Or do you mean "most recent"?
- "Chopra starred in commercially successful films like" -> Chopras has featured in commercially successful films such as...
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Try to avoid things like "several" and "a few" as this is an encyclopaedia.
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "she won every "Best Actress" award in India" some claim, are you sure you can reference this?
- refrenced. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "for her blazing trails in " not encyclopedic writing.
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- " 56 awards from 65 nominations." does not match the infobox.
- Done. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- "recognize" vs "organisation" please select a consistent WP:ENGVAR and stick with it throughout.
- Adopted. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- IMDB is not considered a reliable source.
- Removed. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- If you mention publications like The Telegraph, you should have location and/or publisher information so we don't confuse it with The Daily Telegraph for example.
- Given. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Check all references have publisher information.
- Checked. Pks1142 (talk) 22:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
- Miss World and Stardust Awards linked twice in the lead.
- July 18, 1982->18 July 1982 to maintain consistency.
- Infobox image requires "alt text".
- "Awards won" in the infobox and listed ones doesn't match.
- Corrected—PKS:1142 · 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- "which made her second and last woman to win in this category (the category has been retired since 2008)" needs a source.
- Refrenced.—PKS:1142 · 08:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- "commercially successful films such as Mujhse Shaadi Karogi (2004), Krrish (2006) and Don (2006)" ditto.
- Refrenced.—PKS:1142 · 08:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- India: refs should come after a punctuation.
- "BIG Star Entertainment Awards" should come before "Bollywood Hungama Surfers' Choice Awards".
- The infobox listing also needs to be sorted alphabetically.
- "Nominated work" -> Priyanka Chopra wrong.
- Corrected.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- No source for Fashion Bollywood Hungama Surfers' Choice Awards.
- What makes sources like "Indiaglitz", "desihits.com", "indya.com", "pinkvilla.com", etc., reliable?
- Explanation: DesiHits is a very reliable source, indya.com is an archive of Screen award nomination, Indiaglitz source is presented by a very well known author Subhash K. Jha and Pinkvilla is just showing the exact nominations list.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Five refs missing publisher information in Screen Awards.
- Explanations for "World Music Awards" is unsourced.
- Explanation is taken from its wikipedia article.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Why is "The Times of India" linked in ref #13 and not in others or ref #3. EIther link all or the first occurrence alone.
- Why are "bollywood hungama", "bbc.uk." "rediff.com" italicised in refs.
- Done.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)v
- Overlinking in the prose part of certain awards.
- "Superstar of Tomorrow – Female" for Mujhse Shaadi Karogi is not verified by the BBC source. It shows only a picture of chopra receiving the award.
- replaced.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- First two refs in "Cosmopolitan Fun Fearless Awards" are improperly formatted.
- The Honours section is completely unsourced.
- refrenced.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Why no tables for "Recognitions"? This being a list everything should be presented in tabular form.
- Any reason for emboldening text inside "Recognitions"?
- "Other Awards" count in the infobox and table doesn't tally.
- First Indian Actress to cast her foot impression in Salvatore Ferragamo Museum. This neither looks like an award nor a recognition to me.
- removed.—PKS:1142 · 09:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- My biggest concern with this article is the quality of sources being used; a few sources doesn't seem like verifying the facts. Besides this there are a lot of formatting errors in refs and MOS issues. I did not go fully through the prose, table and check all the references. Given the number of concerns, I may have to oppose the list at the moment. —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- I somewhat Disagree with you regarding Its reliability, as I have used the most reliable sources found on the web. Yes, some sources are not that reliable But they are reliable enough to prove everything correctly.—PKS:1142 · 10:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comments from Baffle gab1978 (talk):
I'm not a reviewer but have been asked to comment upon this list. It's looking a lot better since I first saw it, but could benefit from further improvement. These are my suggestions for changes to improve/expand the prose, which do not represent an endorsement for or against its listing as a featured list:
- Header prose
- General
- Numbers smaller than ten should be written out in words, so use 'four' instead of '4' per WP:MOSNUM (but see 'exceptions'). I'm sorry I didn't notice this earlier!
- 1st para
- "Born in Jamshedpur India," - needs a comma between city and country; doesn't need a comma after 'India'.
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "After spending years in United States" - how many years? --> "After spending x years in the United States..."
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Chopra returned to India, she participated in" --> "Chopra returned to India where she participated in...".
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Chopra received a number of nominations for her part in Andaaz," - how many nominations? What was her role in it?
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "In 2004, Chopra won many awards for her performance in Aitraaz" - needs a comma after Aitraaz. How many nominations? What was her role in it?
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "(the category has been retired since 2008)" --> "..., which was retired in 2008" or "which has not been awarded since 2008" - avoid using bracketted statements where possible.
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Chopra has featured in commercially successful films such as Mujhse Shaadi Karogi (2004), Krrish (2006) and Don (2006) which won her a number of awards and nominations." - needs a comma between the film and "which". Why isn't "Don (2006)" listed in the tables?
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- 2nd para
- "From 2010-12, Chopra received many nominations and won a few including a consecutive Apsara Award for Best Actress for Kaminey (2009) and another Filmfare Award in Best Actress (Critics' Choice) category for 7 Khoon Maaf (2012)." --> "From 2010-2012, Chopra received x nominations and won several, including two consecutive Apsara Awards for Best Actress for Fashion (2008) and Kaminey (2009), and another Filmfare Award for Best Actress (Critics' Choice) category for 7 Khoon Maaf (2012)."
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "In 2012, Chopra's first single In My City..." - needs quotemarks around "In My City" per MOS:QUOTEMARKS
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- 3rd para
- "...for the inauguration function of Atlantis, The Palm." --> "for the inauguration function of Atlantis, The Palm, a luxury holiday resort in Dubai." or "for the inauguration function of a luxury holiday resort in Dubai called Atlantis, The Palm."
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- "Eastern Eye ranked her at the top of their list of "World's Sexiest Asian Women" twice." --> "Eastern Eye twice ranked her at the top of their list of "World's Sexiest Asian Women."
- Done. —PKS:1142 · 03:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- List
- Bhaskar Bollywood Awards
- "The Bhaskar Bollywood Awards are presented by Dainik Bhaskarfor excellence in Hindi Film Industry." --> "The Bhaskar Bollywood Awards are presented by Dainik Bhaskar for excellence in the Hindi film industry."
- Bollywood Hungama Surfers' Choice Awards
- "Chopra has won two awards, both in Best Actress Category in two consecutive years.year." --> "Chopra has won the award in the Best Actress Category in two consecutive years."
- Filmfare Awards
- "They are presented annually by The Times Group to honour both artistic and technical excellence of professionals in the Hindi language film industry of India." --> "They are presented annually by The Times Group to honour both artistic and technical excellence of professionals in the Indian Hindi language film industry."
- Indian Telly Awards
- "The Indian Telly Awards are presented annually to honour excellence of professionals in Television Industry." --> "The Indian Telly Awards are presented annually to honour excellence of professionals in the television Industry."
- Lions Gold Awards
- "The Lions Gold Awards is an annual accolade presented to Indian Film Industry." --> "The Lions Gold Awards is an annual accolade presented to the Indian film industry."
- National Film Awards
- "The awards are presented by President of India." --> "The awards are presented by the President of India."
- People's Choice Awards India
- "recognising Indian Film, Television, Music and Sports." --> "recognising Indian film, television, music and sports."
- Global Indian Film and TV Honours
- "Hindi film & Television industry." --> "Hindi film and television industries."
- Recognitions
- "In addition to achieving merit honours, Chopra has been recognised for her contributions and is the recipient of several achievement honours by various organisations." --> "In addition to the industry awards, Chopra has been recognised for her contributions to Indian cinema and is the recipient of several achievement honours by various organisations."
- General comments - I think this list has improved a lot since I first reviewed it, and I'm glad to see that the suggested changes from reviewing editors have been implemented. Cheers, and good luck with the nomination, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 14:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank You for your suggestions.—PKS:1142 · 15:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Just a general comment about the article as I'm not general a FLC reviewer...I don't see any issues currently as far as with MOS or prose. List has adequate lead and details in tabular format. I'll watchlist this page and see if any other outstanding issues are mentioned by more seasoned reviewers, but I currently Support this for Featured List.--MONGO 16:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the support.—PKS:1142 · 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
General comment: this level of comment on a list usually indicates that the list is not ready for nomination, so we should consider a withdrawal until the list is ready for review. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think so, your queries has been resolved. So, pls don't point fingers towards its nomination. I know it was a bit unready but know, its completely ready for passing FL.—PKS:1142 · 18:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support This list meets the criteria for FL. It is Well-crafted and I don't see any issues with its prose or lead . Good work.Green Parakeet (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)