| Revision as of 15:08, 6 January 2013 editParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,076 edits →Uyunid dynasty: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 15 January 2013 edit undoParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,076 edits last warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> --] (]) 15:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> --] (]) 15:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 19:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 15 January 2013
Uyunid dynasty
I have asked you multiple times to stop giving people the wrong information! It is a wrong and all your recourse are not valid. Pictures of coins show nothing of the history. I know everything about these coins, and it is said that it could not have been from that dynasty. The family it self was never Shia. That is the biggest clue in wich the dynasty was not Shia. Pleas stop this wrong doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibrahim888 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Once more STOP vandalizing the article
I have asked you to stop vandalizing the Uyunid dynasty article! But you have kept going! Pleas stop this vandalism, you are giving people the wrong idea of a great history! Ibrahim888 (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Stop the vandalism
Hello Ashrf1979, I have noticed that you keep changing the verified article about the Uyunid dynasty, and wright false information on it. I ask you to pleas to stope changing the correct information into false information. Pleas stop the vandalism. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibrahim888 (talk • contribs) 06:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bahrain (historical region), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chaldeans, Eastern Province and Assyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Iraqi people
There has been a WP:RfC process at Talk:Iraqi people whether or not to cover ancient Mesopotamians, and there has been consensus among the participating users not to include them. Please respect the outcome of this community process. --RJFF (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
Hello, I'm Rafy. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Shabak people seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rafy talk 14:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Replacing Image.
Hi Ashrf1979, you recent image removal on article Ali is unapproved by majority of the editors at the talk page as it can not be a lead image because it depict the artistic depiction and holds a perception of only a small group of people regarding how they perceive Ali. -- Ibrahim ebi (talk) 05:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bahrain (historical region), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rabia and Ahsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Uyunid dynasty
You appear to be involved in a content dispute in the article and really should discuss your changes on the talk page. Rmhermen (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
January 2013
Your recent editing history at Uyunid dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dougweller (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Uyunid dynasty
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Uyunid dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)