Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:26, 17 January 2013

Talk page archives Current talk Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 Archive 55 • Archive 56 • Archive 57 (template link) (revert point)

DYK for Jamestown Opera House

On 1 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jamestown Opera House, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that before it was moved to the opera house, the post office in Jamestown, Ohio, sometimes changed locations once per week? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jamestown Opera House. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

(X! · talk)  · @181  ·  00:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

--Orlady (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Reply at my talk page

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:Northamerica1000#Happy New Year to you too!'s talk page. Message added 03:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC).

re: Creating a page?

Hi. Thanks for the kind offer, but I don't think there's a snowball's chance I'd make it! Happy New Year. Lugnuts 10:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Wonder Woman/GA2

Hi Nyttend. I probably should have left a better edit summary or a hidden message. I cleared the deletion with the other contributor if that helps. Given the blatent abuse (creating a sockpuppet to pass an article you nominated at GA) I thought deleting the whole thing would be best and left a comment at Misplaced Pages talk:Good article nominations#Wonder Woman GA2 saying as much. Is there another speedy criteria that applies or will it have to go through an WP:mfd? I have seen less abusive sockpuppet reviews deleted before using WP:Deny as a reason, so maybe there can be a case here. AIRcorn (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

WonderBoy1998 (talk · contribs) and WeirdWoman123 (talk · contribs) are apparantly the same person . It looks like s/he basically nominated the article as Wonderboy and then reviewed the artcile as WeirdWoman. Amadscientist was just trying to work out what was going on . AIRcorn (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

CSD G6 for Arizona Proposition 102

I see that you removed the CSD because you couldn't find the move request on the talk page; however on the talk page of Talk:Arizona Proposition 102 (2008) it points to the meger discussion on Talk:Nebraska_Initiative_Measure_416#Move.3F because this is part of a multi-page move. Please take a look over there. Sorry the CSD wasn't more clear. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Moved; thanks for the help. Nyttend (talk) 17:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you --- apparently I made the CSD reason more clear on the other page, and just didn't do it on this page. Happy new year! Tiggerjay (talk) 17:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Idly curious — what do you mean by "Redacted phone number"? Nyttend (talk) 17:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Where did you see that, I somewhat remember that. I believe it was someone who posted their own phone number directly on a talk page, and I was simply blanking it. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

It was the edit summary for your 17:45 note here. Perhaps a copy/paste error? Nyttend (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

AH I see that now, it must have been a auto-fill error. 03:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Christmas gift for you, as promised

Hi Nyttend, just to let you know I've filed a BRfA for the task you requested for SDPatrolBot. The request page is at Misplaced Pages:Bots/Requests for approval/SDPatrolBot 5, feel free to add any further comments you have there (I've linked to the previous discussion on my talk page). - Kingpin (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Looks like Snotbot is handling this pretty well at the moment, just with a bit of a delay between the removal and replacement. If it suits you I will probably withdraw the BRfA, and re-open it if it's needed in the future. - Kingpin (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Illinois Central Railroad Freight Depot (Bloomington, Indiana)

On 4 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Illinois Central Railroad Freight Depot (Bloomington, Indiana), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Illinois Central railroad station in Bloomington, Indiana, has two rooflines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Illinois Central Railroad Freight Depot (Bloomington, Indiana). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion review for Old Union School (Chesterville, Ohio)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Old Union School (Chesterville, Ohio). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --doncram 16:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

 Ryan Vesey 17:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the heads-up. Not exactly unanticipated. We did something like this on a voluntary basis a little while back, and it worked reasonably well, but I recall that it led to an incident best described as "Nyah, nyah, nyah!! No matter what I do, you can't touch me!!"

Either he's an exemplar of humanity who has the unfortunate fate that nearly everyone he interacts at Misplaced Pages has a personality disorder, or...? (You choose.) --Orlady (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

A new sympathizers' club seems to be forming. --Orlady (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Nice work documenting Orators Mound. Not every archaeological site is as obscure as BOC! --Orlady (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

UFC 157

Layout for Historic Districts

Greetings from Charleston, South Carolina! Thanks for your message in response to my formatting problems. I've been fishing around for some input, but I haven't had anyone firmly stake out a position on this yet. My neighborhood (Hampton Park Terrace) is on the National Register with about 200 buildings in it. The actual article on the neighborhood itself is just about one screen long, and I feel like a comprehensive gallery of all of the buildings at the bottom of the page would overwhelm the actual article itself from a layout position.

So, I started fooling around with collapsible galleries. I like the idea myself, but I haven't seen anyone else use one. I've gotten some feedback that materials should be opened as a default. Others have questioned whether that will bog down older computers. Others (me included) don't know whether a closed gallery loads any faster than an open gallery.

I also have been sitting on the fence about tables vs. galleries. It seems that MOST collections of NR historic districts use tables, but I'm not keen on that. I just don't like the massive amounts of white space that result. The situation would even be worse for Hampton Park Terrace since the district was nominated purely for its dense collection of homogenous early 20th architecture. There are no individual house names, for example, and there is not much text about each one. Galleries cannot be sorted, of course, but the more I think about it, the less I feel like that is really a very useful funciton. I mean, you could sort by address and date, but I really don't see people doing that very much.

Lastly, I'm wrestling with organizing things street-by-street or comprehensively. I'm can go back and forth on this. I kind of like the street-by-street idea. Hampton Park Terrace is not SO big that a comprehensive gallery would be unuseable, but it would be a lot to take in. And, I know that there are other very large districts that a street-by-street (or style-by-style or decade-by-decade) organization would be helpful inbreaking up massive amounts of info. To the extent, I end up using tables, I don't think there is much reason to do this. But, since galleries cannot be sorted, street-by-street galleries would essentially mimic at least one (of the two?) variables that a person might want to sort by, that is, address.

Any thoughts on all of this?

I'm sort of playing around with this on my Sandbox, here User:ProfReader/sandbox.

I like the tables that you linked to a lot. I think the Vinegar Hill layout looks the best for my purposes, but I'm going to tweak some of the widths a bit. The one thing that I have no idea about is the use of color in the tables. I think I'm going to add a column to designate buildings as either Contributing or Non-contributing. Right now, I have that information (for non-contributing) in the Notes column of the mock-up tables that I was playing with. But, by breaking it out, it eats up a little more of the white space on the table and improves the functionality of the sorting by style. Here's my problem: I've never used colors in the table before, and I'm not sure how to do that. I see on yours that there seem to be some hidden code for what "Contributing Color" and "Notable Color" and things like that mean. I don't see where those terms are defined anywhere on your entries, so I assume there must be some master list somewhere that the coding just picks up on. But, where? If there is a National Register Project standard color scheme to designate the Contributing/Non-contributing status, I'd like to use it, but I have no idea where to go to find that color scheme laid out. Any advice?ProfReader (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Whitelaw Reid House

On 5 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Whitelaw Reid House, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Whitelaw Reid's home still stands near the village of Cedarville, Ohio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Whitelaw Reid House. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Linping

Hi, thanks for helping to move Linping Azylber (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Refund/merge

Here's my point. Let's take a hypothetical. The AFD for article x is 99 "delete" vs. 1 "merge to y". Article is deleted. Editor then requests refund of x, which is granted. Editor merges content to "y". Now, because of licensing issues, he argues that we have to keep the history of "x" available. Editor has now successfully bypassed the AFD result without going to DRV. The only method of preventing that is to not refund material if the intent is to merge it.—Kww(talk) 14:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Asia topic

As a participant of the discussion Talk:Palestine#Requested_move regarding naming change of the page Palestine, you might be interested in discussion Template talk:Asia topic#State of Palestine on changing the redirection target of "Palestine" from "Palestinian territories" to "State of Palestine" at Template:Asia topic. Thank you.Greyshark09 (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Indian Mound Reserve

On 6 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indian Mound Reserve, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Ohio's Indian Mound Reserve includes two prehistoric earthworks (one pictured) and a canyon where a battle was reputedly fought? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indian Mound Reserve. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Orators Mound

On 7 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Orators Mound, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Henry Clay and Daniel Webster addressed crowds from the Orators Mound in Ohio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Orators Mound. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 08:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete Category : South Korea Professional Football League?

Do you know current south korean professional football league status? K-League are splited and League name changed spelling. First division : K League Classic Second division : K League Anymore - is dont used... So new category is needed including K League Classic and K League So I created new category South Korea Professional Football League like Japan Professional Football League. Do you understand what I mean? You are foreigner and you don't know the south korean football status. Don't act without inspection. Do you Know I spent much time in order to created new category and moving contents yesterdya. But you spoiled my contributions. You restore it immediatly. Footwiks (talk)

Are you stupid guy? I explained reason on deletion tag. Is it difficult to undestand? In south Korea professional football, K-League name is don't used anymore. First division new name K League Classic and Second division new name K League.. - Hypeo is don't used. So new category is needed. I created Category South Korea Professinal Football League, like Category:Japan Professional Football League In Korean Misplaced Pages, New category is creatd. "대한민국 프로 축구 리그" This is same meaning "South Korea Professinal Football League"

Why don't delete Category:Japan Professional Football League? Why only attack Category:South Korea Professinal Football League?

Do you check up my contributions? I am korean and I am a big fan of korean football. Do you think that I vandal on wikepedia page about korean football. I am very busy person but I really love korean football so I contributed on korean football page in wikepedia. You are foreigner and you don't know south korean football status. Why interrupt contributions about korean football?

Think as if you were in my place. Can you write korea? Can you edit korean wikepedia and debate with koreans. Can you do cotributo to korean football on korean or english wikepida. You are native english speaker. But English is not my mother tongue. So I can't explain in detail and can't debate English speaker. But I have accurate information about south korean football than any foreingers. So..Please please beleive me. Category K-League is not needed anymore and have to change.

I am very busy person and editing is just hobby. I give up contribution because of you. Keep wrong Category K-League forever on wikepdia. Congratulaions! You win...... Footwiks (talk)

I give up I don't care...Keep wrong contensts forever....I am not wikepdiea employee...Editing is just hobby. I don't have time to debate foreingers. Can you debeate with korean people? You can't write korean at all.Footwiks (talk)

Arbcom

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#User:Doncram and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

If I added you incorrectly, you can probably ask a clerk to remove you.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 06:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I have responded to your question on my talk. -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 07:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harper Mausoleum and George W. Harper Memorial Entrance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lotus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

= Wait person who can debate

I give up contribute about this category issue. I don't care...Keep wrong contensts forever....I am not wikepdiea employee...Editing is just hobby. I don't have time to debate foreingers. Can you debeate with korean people for just hobby editing. Footwiks (talk)Footwiks (talk)

Please keep in mind

An inflexible wikepidia controller like you, many users leave here. If category that I crated is wrong, some people chaged it in the near future. But you don't know south korean football at all and you deleted immediatley. beacaue policy policy policy...Becaue of controller like you, I made a dicision I'll leave wikepidia soon.Footwiks (talk)

Inter-language help needed

I had a look at your request. Both the main article it:Korean League Cup and the category it:Categoria:Korean League Cup share the same title, so by it.wp standards they seem OK. Anyway, I'm not into soccer, so I cannot judge if the title itself is actually OK. If you are still in doubt, you may want to contact the it.wp Soccer Project at it:Discussioni progetto:Sport/Calcio. Ciao, Ary29 (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

another reply here ;) --Lucas (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for McDonald Farm (Xenia, Ohio)

On 9 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article McDonald Farm (Xenia, Ohio), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the McDonald Farm near Xenia supplied Ohio's portion of the Washington Monument? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/McDonald Farm (Xenia, Ohio). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

German Colored Tail Owl

Hallo Nyttend,

you regretted to delete German Colored Tail Owl and redirected it to Königsberg Coloured Head Tumbler. The redirect results from a very bad translation. As you may see Owl pigeons and Tumbler pigeons are two totally different groups of pigeon breeds. The redirect is misleading. I am not able to find a better fitting one. The breed of the Old German Owl has varieties with colored tail feathers, but I have never heard of a German Colored Tail Owl (or a Template:Lang-de). Please delete the redirect. Best regards --PigeonIP (talk) 12:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Same goes for Konigsberg colored tail owl. There is no Konigsberg owl pigeon only tumbler pigeons. --PigeonIP (talk) 12:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Re Reason for deletion of File:MVI 9133 (1.00.04.14).jpg

Hello , not sure if this is the correct way to comment on a talk page, but I wanted to reply to expand on the reason for deletion of File:MVI 9133 (1.00.04.14).jpg as you requested. OR was supposed to refer to 'orphaned' but yes it may well be that this meaning is not quite right. I thought there would be a simple 'delete' / undo upload button. I have simply uploaded this picture in error, whilst trying to look at the options available in the upload process, it uploaded without a clear 'confirm' button. My apologies to waste your time. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Londonrb (talk • contribs) 10:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Saw your talk message - thanks v much for your help on that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Londonrb (talk • contribs) 15:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Urho

Hi, thanks for helping to move Urho Azylber (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram opened

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram/Evidence. Please add your evidence by January 17, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, (X! · talk)  · @806  ·  18:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:LGBT Scientists

You denied the speedy of it here, saying that it is "Obviously not a repost, and the contents are different as well". How is it not a repost when it was discussed and deleted here? The description "This category lists scientists who are, or are known to have been, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender." does not address any of the problems that caused it to be deleted, either. Nymf _{talk to me} 18:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Cheers for the reply. I have to ask, how do you know that the contents are different now? While it is by all means a good faith creation, I believe the problems that was raised previously still exists. The criteria for inclusion is still only that you have to be a scientist and LGBT, and the majority seems to be just that. I will bring it to CFD instead. Nymf _{talk to me} 20:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hasteur (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

License tag

Either revert your edit at File:Camp 7, Guantanamo, via google -a.jpg or add a required license tag to this image. You have removed the deletion tag twice now without addressing its concern at all. Fair use rationale templates do not constitute as license tags, and your application of WP:BURO to copyright-related content is beyond misguided. — ξ 00:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

"Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policy without consideration for the principles of policies". The purpose of copyright tags is to identify the copyright status of a file. Since pages only qualify for F4 speedy if they "lack the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status", and since "Administrators should check the upload summary, file information page, and the image itself for a source before deleting under this criterion", this image does not qualify under F4 and shouldn't be tagged as if it does, since an admin who follows the criterion's instructions will easily be able to verify copyright status. Nyttend (talk) 02:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I find it hilariously ironic that you cite a policy to refute another, especially with one like BURO. Clearly, the image use policy should be followed strictly as it deals with a serious matter like copyright and fair use laws. What exactly would be the point of non-free license tags if fair use rationale templates were enough? Honestly. That makes absolutely no sense. If you have no plans to revert yourself or to add a license tag, I will request more eyes on the matter over at WP:ANI. — ξ 23:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

The point of these templates is to make it easier for people and bots who work with these images: people who aren't familiar enough with them to understand the licensing situation and bots that don't know how to read. Would you give me equal complaints if I removed such a template from an image whose description page contained the text "cc-by-sa" without a template? Or what about an image that had a source statement in the metadata but not on the description page? Also, you may want to go to the US Code, which makes no such requirements; this use of this image is equally fair or not-fair regardless of the presence of a simple fair use template or rationale, and because we only use them because of internal policies, it's absurd to be bureaucratic about it. It would be appreciated if you decided not to press charges against me for removing an speedy deletion template on a page that doesn't qualify for it, or spend a few minutes figuring out which one is appropriate (time that I don't have; there are too many different nonfree templates for me to keep track of them), or even just wait a few days, and the image will be deleted at FFD. Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

The image currently violates WP:NFCC#10b, which requires a licence tag for non-free images. Free images might not need a licence tag (if the licence information still is available somewhere), but it's still better to have a tag. However, the image is currently up for deletion at WP:FFD, and it seems more sensible to let the discussion end there before trying to apply speedy deletion criteria. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

You may have noticed that I already voted in the FFD, and all that I've done was removing a speedy deletion tag that didn't apply; I'm not arguing that it passes every point on a checklist. Nyttend (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Help with User:Eduscapes

ttend, I need your help with User:Eduscapes. She is a college professor and a librarian, and has a history group interested in contributing to Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately she is in Utah, where we do NOT have a WP:GLAM satellite. Could you please contact her and get her on foot? —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

For your post here...the conspiracy enthusiasts have been posting repeatedly at that page & at its Article Feedback since the article was created. Shearonink (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Arun Gawli

Hi! With this edit, you restored the Category:Indian Hindus on the above page. Isn't there a rule for cited self-identification for such categories to be added on biography pages? Regards, Lovy Singhal (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Mound

On 14 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Mound, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a prehistoric mound is located on the U.S. Air Force's Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Mound. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The Palms Lakeshore Pampanga

I marked it as spam because of the external link. Looks like pure advertising to me. But it is fine with me if you don't think so. --I am One of Many (talk) 03:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

NRIS NRHP header

Hi Nyttend, I noticed this edit. Every header that used to have a reference in the old style list still has that in the new system, it was converted. That's why there is a NRISref field in there. What you know did is just broken. What I would suggest is to add a default if NRISref is not set. Multichill (talk) 07:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Reverted. Now I'm confused; see National Register of Historic Places listings in McCracken County, Kentucky, where I added <ref name=nris /> and get a big "Cite error" warning. Why is it doing that if the reference is still there; and more importantly, why do our lists only cite NPS for the recent listings link (This National Park Service list is complete...) if that reference is still there? Nyttend (talk) 13:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I hope to take a look at it later this week. Let's see if I can get this to work in a sandbox. Multichill (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

RfC/U

I was wondering what type of time frame RfC/Us have? Or is there a time frame and a closing schedule?John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

• • Thankyou for your heldful response.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kofi Annan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gold Coast

Mercer Log House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mad River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Z Densetsu: Owarinaki Kakumei

Hi! Could you look at it: Template:Did you know nominations/Z Densetsu: Owarinaki Kakumei. I added a sentence about transformation belts. Sorry for the delay,. I explained it there. I searched the net, but I didn't find any general sentences, so I could write anything meaningful. Since Anosola seemed to be knowledgeable about the subject, I wanted him to write a couple of sentences. --Moscow Connection (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

CrimsonBot

Hi,Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page about User:CrimsonBot. I do want to note, that I disagree with your actions, because the bot hadn't edited in 2 days. Don't worry about unblocking it though, I came back just a while ago and at this point in time it seems as though wiki has changed for the worse. I will be retiring myself as well as retiring the bot. This isn't because of your actions alone, this is just everything combined which has been a pretty bad experience since coming back. Again thanks for your comment on my talk page, and I hope you have a wonderful day. CrimsonBlue (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)