| Revision as of 03:14, 19 January 2013 editPolo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,733 edits wrong noti...← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:30, 19 January 2013 edit undoSadaam Insane (talk | contribs)15 edits →ANI: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Following your latest questionable edits it seems clear you have some kind of personal interest in this article. Since the copy vios and source problems has been fixed now by diligent editors, from now on you will need to provide some reasons on the talk page of the article for your continued campaign for deletion of the entirety or parts of this article. Failure to do so will be regarded as disruptive editing. Thanks. --] (]) 03:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | Following your latest questionable edits it seems clear you have some kind of personal interest in this article. Since the copy vios and source problems has been fixed now by diligent editors, from now on you will need to provide some reasons on the talk page of the article for your continued campaign for deletion of the entirety or parts of this article. Failure to do so will be regarded as disruptive editing. Thanks. --] (]) 03:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == ANI == | |||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 03:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:30, 19 January 2013
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
January 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to The Lords of the New Church, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 03:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi 66.177.78.24. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for The Lords of the New Church, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Mediran (t • c) 03:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The Lords of the New Church
Following your latest questionable edits it seems clear you have some kind of personal interest in this article. Since the copy vios and source problems has been fixed now by diligent editors, from now on you will need to provide some reasons on the talk page of the article for your continued campaign for deletion of the entirety or parts of this article. Failure to do so will be regarded as disruptive editing. Thanks. --Saddhiyama (talk) 03:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sadaam Insane (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)