| Revision as of 07:30, 21 January 2013 edit99.129.112.89 (talk) feel sorry for people like you← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:34, 21 January 2013 edit undoWalter Görlitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers294,571 edits Warning: Edit warring on Contemporary Christian music. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == January 2013 == | == January 2013 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 07:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 07:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 07:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 07:34, 21 January 2013
The CCM is not CCM magazine
You keep linking contemporary Christian music when you mean to link to CCM Magazine. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Not true. I already connected it to CCM Magazine when it applied. Please discuss in talk page, do not create edit wars. It's unproductive. This can go to an arbitration/concensus/resolution page if necessary. It's all fine, just not how you want it (as is many other edits I see you have hystorically reverted). 99.129.112.89 (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please resolve in talk page, do not create edit wars while a discussion is already in process. Wiki does not promote editors getting their way with articles. Thanks! 99.129.112.89 (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- I saw it twice. I removed it twice. Contrary to what you wrote on my talk page, and I have moved here, I am not edit warring: you are. I'm sorry you feel that I am getting in your way, I am simply preserving Misplaced Pages from bad edits, mostly bad references.
- Please stop now and learn to edit. You removed the welcome message here. Feel free to see the information provided there. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
How are they bad sources? You are not supposed to attack editors. You typed "learn to edit". There needs to be a consensus. I am requesting this go to an arbitration/resolution article to discuss. You have a history of just reverting things you don't like. That is wrong! You created the edit war, not me. The info is correct. Seems like I'm the one getting in your way as you have an "agenda" and want to sabatoge my efforts (and others). I took time doing that and it seems like you and the other editor are "jealous"? 99.129.112.89 (talk) 07:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
January 2013
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Contemporary Christian music, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Contemporary Christian music. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.