Revision as of 07:59, 24 January 2013 view sourceTagremover (talk | contribs)4,797 edits →Statement by Tagremover← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:30, 25 January 2013 view source Callanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,478 edits →Tagremover disputes: Withdrawn by filling party Next edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}} | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== Tagremover disputes == | |||
=== Involved parties === | |||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | |||
*{{userlinks|Tagremover}}, ''filing party'' | |||
*{{userlinks|Blackmane}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Thumperward}} | |||
*{{userlinks|The Bushranger}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Marteau}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Andros 1337}} | |||
*{{userlinks|Bwilkins}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | |||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request | |||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | |||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
=== Statement by Tagremover === | |||
I am absolutely desperate. I have been the main editor mostly of technology related articles since many years, first as IP. As i am a scientist, i think my contributions mainly to articles were valuable. English is not my mother-language. | |||
I had two blocks: One for edit-war at ], where the other editor was blocked, too: Somehow understandable. | |||
A second recently: For Edit war/ tag removal at ], where a user requested a reference about the exact definition of the "Super": There is and never will be such an definition, as there is no clear definition for ] or ], see ]. I was blocked without getting heard: Without discussion. My reason: ]: to improve Misplaced Pages. | |||
At recent incidents of the ] i posted an original research on the talk page: to start an discussion. I used a bold language, as the consequences calculated by me were serious, and later events and analysts joined my results. But this was the main fault: Other editors regarded me as: Anti-Boeing. | |||
I was taken to ANI: , done some article edits and posted detailed reasons, why 3 sentences should be changed. First sentence is solved, a second has a proposal. | |||
Its got worse at ANI, and i see questionable valuations, even from admins. '''I have no intention that other parties get blocked'''. But i see a high probability i am blocked for questionable reasons and valuations. | |||
Actual details at ANI ] and ]. | |||
I am sorry to occupy your time, but i see in this case a problem of minority editors. | |||
If i am getting blocked or topic banned, i will leave Misplaced Pages for ever. ] (]) 12:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:@]: But thats exactly whats being disputed: Neutrality. ] (]) 16:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Decline: Can see it, wouldn't done if differently in most cases. ] (]) 07:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
As a decline of this case seems to be clear, '''i propose to close this case (i withdraw this request)''' as i am not interested in consuming anybodies time. Thank you very much. ] (]) 07:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by The Bushranger === | |||
It should be noted that my sole involvement in this dispute, to my knowledge, was a ] caution to a different editor on the AN/I discussion. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 21:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Marteau === | |||
Several days ago, I stated that I "gave up" on the article in question due to Tagremover, and that is still the case, and as far as what happens to Tagremover (or to me, actually) from this point on, I really and quite honestly don't much care. | |||
I did call Tagremover "insufferable" on the talk page and advised him to tighten up his prose because it was painful to read. When he said the article was biased but did not (at the time) give specific examples, I said he smeared the entire editing pool for the article (for allowing that to happen, was my intent, and I should have added). I stand by these words. | |||
I've washed my hands of the article and Tagremover and actually care little what the outcome of this arbitration is. I am not "invested" in the article or what happens to him, and if I never get to edit it again because he remains, it will not bother me. I will, in any event, not edit any articles in which he participates because it would be, in my limited experience with him, a highly distasteful and unpleasant task and I don't edit here to find new ways of causing myself stress. | |||
I honestly don't care if he stays or goes or if he is banned in some way, or if I am sanctioned for calling things as I see them on the talk page. I believe he is a liability to the encyclopedia, and if I had my druthers, I would choose to see him not participate, but quite honestly, I care very little what happens to him. I do however stand by everything I have done or said regarding him and the article. | |||
If there is something I have not addressed, please let me know, I am more than willing to answer any direct queries. ] (]) 21:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Andros 1337 === | |||
I totally disagree with User:Tagremover's statements. He/she is simply abusing Misplaced Pages policy to impose his/her anti-Boeing POV onto the Boeing 787 article, making all of these disruptive requests to administrators to get his/her way. This seems like an obvious case of ]. ]] 23:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Statement by Blackmane === | |||
I have no content dispute with this user and the only interactions we have had were on the ANI where they were reported. I made a few comments and suggestions is all. ] (]) 19:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== Clerk notes === | |||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' | |||
=== Tagremover disputes: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/5/0/0> === | |||
{{anchor|1=Tagremover disputes: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)</small> | |||
*'''Decline'''. Tagremover and his concerns are currently being discussed on ANI: , and the admins there are able to decide if Tagremover's manner of raising his concerns are appropriate, or if sanctions are needed. It would only be if the community were unable to decide what should be done that ArbCom would get involved. ''']''' ''']''' 15:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline''' per Silktork. Other means of resolving this are underway, and most of the steps listed at ] have not even been attempted yet. This is premature and likely can be handled at a much lower level. ] <small>]</small><sup>(]/]/])</sup> 22:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline'''. This is a dispute that the community is perfectly fit to handle. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> ''']'''</span> ] 23:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline''' in hopes this can be resolved sort of arbitration. ] 04:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Decline''' per all the above. ] (]) 02:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:30, 25 January 2013
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open casesCase name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 10 January 2025 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|