| Revision as of 20:56, 16 May 2006 editPhilosophus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,675 edits afd | Revision as of 20:59, 16 May 2006 edit undoPhilosophus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,675 edits →[]: add about awardNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Completely absurd article. Somewhat high in ghits, but I propose that it is still non-notable. A variety of ghits are on absurd patent sites. No real verifiable sources, mostly questionable papers, and some suspect sources - why is the clinic on the website of some random ISP instead of the hospital website. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | Completely absurd article. Somewhat high in ghits, but I propose that it is still non-notable. A variety of ghits are on absurd patent sites. No real verifiable sources, mostly questionable papers, and some suspect sources - why is the clinic on the website of some random ISP instead of the hospital website. Also, searching on google for the award mentioned gives only two hits, one of which is to the baobab site. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:59, 16 May 2006
Bi-Digital O-Ring Test
Completely absurd article. Somewhat high in ghits, but I propose that it is still non-notable. A variety of ghits are on absurd patent sites. No real verifiable sources, mostly questionable papers, and some suspect sources - why is the clinic on the website of some random ISP instead of the hospital website. Also, searching on google for the award mentioned gives only two hits, one of which is to the baobab site. Philosophus 20:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)