Revision as of 02:44, 9 July 2012 editHerbxue (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,206 edits →new sandbox: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:38, 3 February 2013 edit undoTippyGoomba (talk | contribs)1,712 edits →February 2013: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Herbxue/SandboxLiuBin#New_Article:_Liu_Bin | http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Herbxue/SandboxLiuBin#New_Article:_Liu_Bin | ||
== February 2013 == | |||
] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 01:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:38, 3 February 2013
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
TestingHerbxue (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Sandbox for Acu Mechanisms Section
Moved to User:Herbxue/Acupuncture mechanisms
COI is/isn't: WP:COS
Hi Herbxue -- just wanted you to know about the above in case you get accused of COI. Just being an acupunturist doesn't mean you have one. regards, Middle 8 (talk) 12:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Nothing
I wrote a bunch of the Nothingness article from a western perspective (much derived from Bertrand Russell's historical accountings). I was not able to understand the Bhuddist concept of nothingness to contribute much, but it should be a big section of that article. Can you help add anything? PPdd (talk) 06:43, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll check it out.Herbxue (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Tai chi listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tai chi. Since you had some involvement with the Tai chi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Other related redirects are nominated at the same link. ~ Kimelea (talk) 03:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Taijiquan lineage tree expansion & clarification
Please chime in on the discussion, T'ai chi ch'uan#Styles / Lineage Table. InferKNOX (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
new sandbox
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Herbxue/SandboxLiuBin#New_Article:_Liu_Bin
February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. TippyGoomba (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)