| Revision as of 17:21, 9 February 2013 editThe Blade of the Northern Lights (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators55,818 edits Agh← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:00, 9 February 2013 edit undoMaster of Puppets (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,455 edits →Nomination: +co-nomNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| I appreciate there may be some concerns with Secret, given the incident from 2009. I was obviously not around when it occurred, but after many conversations with him I’m completely convinced it was an aberration and has no chance of happening again. We really need more admins willing to step up and do some of the dirty work, which Secret is as ready and eager to do as ever, so there is nothing to lose from giving him back the admin tools to do it. I think the community will agree with me that Secret will be a huge positive as an admin. ] (]) 17:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | I appreciate there may be some concerns with Secret, given the incident from 2009. I was obviously not around when it occurred, but after many conversations with him I’m completely convinced it was an aberration and has no chance of happening again. We really need more admins willing to step up and do some of the dirty work, which Secret is as ready and eager to do as ever, so there is nothing to lose from giving him back the admin tools to do it. I think the community will agree with me that Secret will be a huge positive as an admin. ] (]) 17:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| '''Co-nomination''' - Blade sums Secret up well; he's an excellent editor who'd make great use of the tools. With over 40% mainspace edits, he is a prolific content contributor; likewise, he shows familiarity with maintenance-related aspects of the project, with 1600 edits to the namespace. While Secret's been through some rough patches in the past, I'm confident that those mistakes will remain unrepeated, and that he will continue helping us build this amazing project. ] 18:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. --> | :''Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:''<!-- The candidate may make an optional statement here. If this request is a self nomination, feel free to remove this line. --> | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 9 February 2013
User:Secret
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page)
(0/0/0); Scheduled to end You're almost there. All you need to do now is substitute the time parser function (it isn't as scary as it sounds, edit the page and inline comments will guide you). This will generate a fixed end time. Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
Nomination
Secret (talk · contribs) – I would like to nominate one of our best editors here for adminship. Secret has been a Wikipedian for 7 years now, and after a little more than a year from his previous RfA he’s ready to try again. Content-wise, he’s done a tremendous amount of work on American athletes, especially baseball players. The topic area is often beset by fanboys and vandals, and his ability to maintain his composure in those areas should speak to his current maturity and readiness for adminship. In terms of policy, he’s clearly got a high level of competence, and has made completely sure to brush up on everything one more time before this RfA.
I appreciate there may be some concerns with Secret, given the incident from 2009. I was obviously not around when it occurred, but after many conversations with him I’m completely convinced it was an aberration and has no chance of happening again. We really need more admins willing to step up and do some of the dirty work, which Secret is as ready and eager to do as ever, so there is nothing to lose from giving him back the admin tools to do it. I think the community will agree with me that Secret will be a huge positive as an admin. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Co-nomination - Blade sums Secret up well; he's an excellent editor who'd make great use of the tools. With over 40% mainspace edits, he is a prolific content contributor; likewise, he shows familiarity with maintenance-related aspects of the project, with 1600 edits to the namespace. While Secret's been through some rough patches in the past, I'm confident that those mistakes will remain unrepeated, and that he will continue helping us build this amazing project. m.o.p 18:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
RfAs for this user:- Links for Secret: Secret (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Secret can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
| RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
Oppose
Neutral