| Revision as of 18:16, 14 February 2013 editErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,276 edits This sounds better← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:51, 14 February 2013 edit undoCavarrone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers94,973 edits →Capri Anderson: kNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *What? Why ''doesn't'' it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of ]. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | *What? Why ''doesn't'' it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of ]. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep'''. Outside of what the nominator "'']''", the subject clearly passes our notability guidelines. She won an ] for best supporting actress, she was nominated to a ] for best actress and to several other AVN Awards for best actress, crossover star of the year, best web starlet and best tease performance (plus a bunch of scene awards that, per consensus, do not count towards notability). Even ignoring ], that quite recently received widespread consensus on its actual version, how she fails ]? Misplaced Pages is not ], and she is clearly notable in her field. I ask myself if the nominator would have rised the same objections if Anderson was an award winning graphic designer, or a clay pigeon shooter. ] (]) 19:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 14 February 2013
Capri Anderson
AfDs for this article:- Capri Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We have been here before. She has now won an industry award that leads to no real world reliable coverage and I personally feel that PORNBIO is not a reliable SNG because it contradicts BLP that requires proper sourcing for biographical articles. I therefore do not feel the AVN = a notable second event and that this remains essentially a BLP1E. Spartaz 13:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- What? Why doesn't it lead to "no real world reliable coverage"? This has been discussed a second time very thoroughly not only on the WP:BIO talk page, but on this article's talk page as well (including with the admin that deleted it, who now endorses it). You even acknowledge that she won the award (Best Supporting Actress, not a scene-related award), so this reeks of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. (Or are you just calling BLP1E because of her connection to Charlie Sheen?) Erpert 18:10, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Outside of what the nominator "personally feels", the subject clearly passes our notability guidelines. She won an AVN Award for best supporting actress, she was nominated to a XBIZ Award for best actress and to several other AVN Awards for best actress, crossover star of the year, best web starlet and best tease performance (plus a bunch of scene awards that, per consensus, do not count towards notability). Even ignoring WP:PORNBIO, that quite recently received widespread consensus on its actual version, how she fails WP:ANYBIO? Misplaced Pages is not censored, and she is clearly notable in her field. I ask myself if the nominator would have rised the same objections if Anderson was an award winning graphic designer, or a clay pigeon shooter. Cavarrone (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)