Revision as of 18:36, 19 February 2013 editPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,454 edits {{WikiProject Theatre}} | Revision as of 19:31, 21 February 2013 edit undoRexxS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,075 edits →Metadata: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Theatre}} | {{WikiProject Theatre}} | ||
== Metadata == | |||
If the {{tl|infobox organization}} template is used, it produces the following metadata as far as I can see: | |||
* class="vcard" for the table as a whole | |||
* class="org" for 'Renaissance Theatre Company' | |||
* class="dtstart" for '1987' | |||
* class="dtend" for '1994' | |||
All of these are useful pieces of information that then become immediately available to re-users by standardised means of scraping data. | |||
I don't think that the small infobox is aesthetically unappealing in this case, although I accept that others may disagree. Nevertheless, at present, use of the infobox is far-and-away the most convenient means that editors have to make the metadata available, and I suggest that the advantage of its retention here outweighs the likely disadvantages that I can see (repetition of info and aesthetics, I assume). I'd be happy to discuss these issues here if there is a case to be made for removal of the infobox. --] (]) 19:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:31, 21 February 2013
Theatre Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Metadata
If the {{infobox organization}} template is used, it produces the following metadata as far as I can see:
- class="vcard" for the table as a whole
- class="org" for 'Renaissance Theatre Company'
- class="dtstart" for '1987'
- class="dtend" for '1994'
All of these are useful pieces of information that then become immediately available to re-users by standardised means of scraping data.
I don't think that the small infobox is aesthetically unappealing in this case, although I accept that others may disagree. Nevertheless, at present, use of the infobox is far-and-away the most convenient means that editors have to make the metadata available, and I suggest that the advantage of its retention here outweighs the likely disadvantages that I can see (repetition of info and aesthetics, I assume). I'd be happy to discuss these issues here if there is a case to be made for removal of the infobox. --RexxS (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories: