Misplaced Pages

User talk:Anwar saadat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:27, 18 May 2006 editAksi great (talk | contribs)10,008 edits Userboxes← Previous edit Revision as of 07:58, 19 May 2006 edit undoAnwar saadat (talk | contribs)11,289 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
*All unsigned comments will be removed anytime without notice *All unsigned comments will be removed anytime without notice
*Uncivil editors will not be acknowledged *Uncivil editors will not be acknowledged

=== Your editing policies ===
Just a tip, when someone leaves an unsigned comment, then you can use the template <nowiki>{{unsigned|username}}</nowiki> which would produce {{unsigned|username}}. Just because someone forgot to sign doesn't mean you ignore their comments. ''']''' ] 00:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


==My Voting Policies== ==My Voting Policies==
Line 56: Line 53:
thankyou Anwar saadat for the additional question on my rfa, and taking the time to consider it, i have now answered it, thanks ] 02:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC) thankyou Anwar saadat for the additional question on my rfa, and taking the time to consider it, i have now answered it, thanks ] 02:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
: I have given my vote. Please mind your tally. One user has changed from neutral stance to support. ] 13:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC) : I have given my vote. Please mind your tally. One user has changed from neutral stance to support. ] 13:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

==Troll==
=== Your editing policies ===
Just a tip, when someone leaves an unsigned comment, then you can use the template <nowiki>{{unsigned|username}}</nowiki> which would produce {{unsigned|username}}. Just because someone forgot to sign doesn't mean you ignore their comments. ''']''' ] 00:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

=== Userboxes ===
Hello again. I noticed that you have used 2 images and on your userboxes. It would be wiser to remove them as according to ] "Fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages.". So till you find a free image, I don't think you should use them on your user page. - ] (]) 06:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

=== RFA Opposition Spree ===
Please be careful before opposing RFAs for no reason. The issues I have seen you present include:
*This editor has issues.
*Per Ardenn (who presented no reason to oppose apart from the fact that no RFA should go unopposed)
*I am shocked and appalled and petrified and mortified. Adminship is not a joke (in response to the guy that was running for adminship making a joke on the RFA page to celebrate his 5000th post)
This is in your best interests as it seriously undermines your credibility. ''']''' ] 09:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

== Troll? ==
Hello. I see that you have still not removed the images from your user page and moved my comment to a heading marked troll. Well, it is upto you how you tag comments on your talk page, but whether you consider me a troll or not (you may be interested in reading ]) that is no reason to keep images on your user page. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that you cannot use these images, and I have warned other users too about the policy . Please try and understand. - ] (]) 06:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
:How's my advice about unsigned comments considered trolling??? ''']''' ] 07:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


==You drink?== ==You drink?==
Line 72: Line 87:
The above harangue was duly reported in . Also see the . The abusive admin has ''withdrawn'' his observation but not come forward to tender a full unconditional public apology. The above harangue was duly reported in . Also see the . The abusive admin has ''withdrawn'' his observation but not come forward to tender a full unconditional public apology.
|} |}

===The peace dove===
] I think you felt really hurt. And, this is by way of just a gesture of goodwill. You are free to initiate suitable measures against me as deemed fit by you. The decision of the wiki-community shall be acceptable to me. --] 13:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)]]


== Urban data on districts == == Urban data on districts ==
Line 93: Line 111:
::Would ] help you? - ] (]) 16:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC) ::Would ] help you? - ] (]) 16:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
: I think I got it. ] 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC) : I think I got it. ] 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

== Userboxes ==

Hello again. I noticed that you have used 2 images and on your userboxes. It would be wiser to remove them as according to ] "Fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages.". So till you find a free image, I don't think you should use them on your user page. - ] (]) 06:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:58, 19 May 2006

My Archives

Archiving

Hey Anwar, if you ever need to tidy stuff up but still keep it, you can create a subpage of your talkpage, called (eg) User talk:Anwar Saadat/Archive 1. Try Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page for proper instructions. A lot of folk take pride in keeping the good and the bad, regardless - but it's your page, do it how you like! Cheers, JackyR 00:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

If the updates are retained I retain all notes pertaining to them. Otherwise, its a waste of space. Anwar saadat 13:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Sounds a good idea... Must clean up my own talk page... ;-) JackyR 11:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
But it is worth heeding the advice of some of the edits to your talkpage before you delete them, such as adding correct copyright information to the various images you uploaded! 12:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

My Works In Progress

  • Districtwise urban data for India
  • Current GDP per capita decadal growth for countries

My Editing Policies

  • All unsigned comments will be removed anytime without notice
  • Uncivil editors will not be acknowledged

My Voting Policies

  • Mature civil editors, with wide-ranging interests and solid contributions, who presume good faith in conflict resolution get my vote

Ajith

As you've archived your compromise I'll have to start a new section. Anyway, the point is this. I don't agree with your compromise. If you decided to go and start edit North Indian pages I wouldn't care, as long as your edits conformed with Misplaced Pages policies. But the thing you seem to have forgotten is that Misplaced Pages is the Free Encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. That includes non-Tamils, our lack of knowledge on Kollywood does not reflect on our lack of knowledge of English and Misplaced Pages Policies. If we read the article and see it contains unnecessary boasting (by using words like mega-) then we will change it. So, no, you cannot bar non-Tamils from editing Kollywood articles. Nobleeagle (Talk) 08:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Nobleeagle here. Read verbatim, Misplaced Pages's policy states that: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Anwar, despite my suggestion to you to wait for a couple of days, you've gone ahead making edits across the board. Also, your "compromise" saying non-Tamils should be barred from editing Tamil articles is, at best, unacceptable. -- Sundar 08:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I note that you have not edited across the board. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Just cool off for some more time. -- Sundar 09:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
He's back now, apparently I'm a fascist. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
And now he's attacking good quality articles like Indian cricket team, which is currently running for SAC and just became a Good Article. He's stalking me and Zora, as his only edits to articles like Rajesh Khanna, Indian cricket team and Hindutva have been reversions. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
You also should not revert Zora on Veer-Zaara citing "italicise" when it is clearly a content replacement.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Did I mention Major power, I suspect he's checking my contributions and visiting each of the pages. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, I give up. Deal with him as per the policies. -- Sundar 08:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Block

Anwar, despite repeated requests for civility by so many wikipedians, you continue to break the decorum and act uncivil. I had no option but to have you blocked for 24 hrs. This will be noted in your block log, and it might hurt your chances for adminship in the future. If you wish to be an admin in the future, please start maturing. =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Ajith Official Homepage

Hello, Anwar, I noticed that you are looking for a picture of Ajith to add it to the corresponding article without other editors deleting it again because of copyright issues. If you know a page where I can find some pictures of him from his movies like promotional material or screen shots, we could take a picture from there and I'll look after copyright information so Ajith finally gets his well-deserved picture. Also: the link in his box (ajithfans.com) is not his official homepage, but a fan page. It says there that it is about Ajith but not affiliated with him. If he has an official homepage, built by his agent or his production company, we could link it, but fan pages, because of copyright issues should generally not be linked at Misplaced Pages. It has nothing to do with the page itself, merely with the fact that it's not Ajith's official homepage. Best regards, --Plumcouch 17:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Anwar, I found a picture of Ajith with copyright information, so I added it. Hope you are happy with it. Also, I found his official homepage and linked it under his picture. Best regards, --Plumcouch 19:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Clear up a bit of controversy

Just want to clarify whether any of the following IP Addresses are yours. As their contributions fit perfectly with your interests and so does their POV. Could you please clear up the matter. Thanks. Nobleeagle (Talk) 08:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC) User:212.32.85.221 User:212.32.115.163

I would appreciate and feel happy if you come out clean on this issue. check my talk page, to know why are you asked about it. --M.arunprasad 13:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


my rfa

thankyou Anwar saadat for the additional question on my rfa, and taking the time to consider it, i have now answered it, thanks Benon 02:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I have given my vote. Please mind your tally. One user has changed from neutral stance to support. Anwar saadat 13:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Troll

Your editing policies

Just a tip, when someone leaves an unsigned comment, then you can use the template {{unsigned|username}} which would produce — Preceding unsigned comment added by username (talkcontribs) . Just because someone forgot to sign doesn't mean you ignore their comments. Nobleeagle (Talk) 00:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hello again. I noticed that you have used 2 images and on your userboxes. It would be wiser to remove them as according to Fair use policy "Fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages.". So till you find a free image, I don't think you should use them on your user page. - Aksi_great (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

RFA Opposition Spree

Please be careful before opposing RFAs for no reason. The issues I have seen you present include:

  • This editor has issues.
  • Per Ardenn (who presented no reason to oppose apart from the fact that no RFA should go unopposed)
  • I am shocked and appalled and petrified and mortified. Adminship is not a joke (in response to the guy that was running for adminship making a joke on the RFA page to celebrate his 5000th post)

This is in your best interests as it seriously undermines your credibility. Nobleeagle (Talk) 09:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Troll?

Hello. I see that you have still not removed the images from your user page and moved my comment to a heading marked troll. Well, it is upto you how you tag comments on your talk page, but whether you consider me a troll or not (you may be interested in reading Misplaced Pages:What is a troll) that is no reason to keep images on your user page. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that you cannot use these images, and I have warned other users too about the policy . Please try and understand. - Aksi_great (talk) 06:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

How's my advice about unsigned comments considered trolling??? Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

You drink?

I am shocked to learn that you being a Muslim take drinks , . --Bhadani 14:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

In case, you come to Chennai, I would like to meet you. Thanks. --Bhadani 16:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

A friendly advice

Your proclamation on user page that you support the independence of Kashmir may attract the proviso of the Indian Penal Code, and in case you are a citizen of India, and hold an Indian Passport; you may be charged with treason. This is a friendly advice and the statement of factual position , and not a Legal Threat as defined in wikipedia. --Bhadani 17:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Further, in case, you are an Indian citizen, your above assertion may lead any Indian to file a case in an Indian Court, and the Court may order blocking of access to wikipedia in India. That day shall be really a sad day for we wikipedians. --Bhadani 17:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
In case, I do not get any response from you within a reasonable time of say two to three days, I shall be constrained to beleive that you are an Indian citizen, and shall remove the above assertion from your user page to avoid a position as indicated above. Regards. --Bhadani 17:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I would like to meet you in person or talk with you over phone to expalin to you the "nitty-gritty" of the position. --Bhadani 17:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
However, in case, you are not a citizen of India, your seertion may be continued on your user page - though I am not sure of the direction Indian Courts would take for such matters. --Bhadani 17:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

The above harangue was duly reported in WPANI. Also see the discussion in WPVP. The abusive admin has withdrawn his observation but not come forward to tender a full unconditional public apology.

The peace dove

Peace Dove I think you felt really hurt. And, this is by way of just a gesture of goodwill. You are free to initiate suitable measures against me as deemed fit by you. The decision of the wiki-community shall be acceptable to me. --Bhadani 13:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Urban data on districts

Hello Anwar, Good job updating the urban data on the district articles. Here is barnstar for that. May I suggest that you add a sub-heading, "Demographics" and add the information under it. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I, Ganeshk, present you this working man's barnstar, in appreciation of his efforts updating demographic data on Indian district articles. Ganeshk (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Vijay picture

Hello, Anwar, I noticed your changes of copyright information of the Vijay picture. You tagged it as "no information on his copyright status". Copyright status information was provided, along with the copyright holder - is anything wrong with the copyright issue I am not aware of? --Plumcouch 07:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, its not a screenshot and its not from Aathi. It was a wallpaper collage copyrighted by indiaglitz.com Anwar saadat 13:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Anwar. I went to the official page, http://www.aathithefilm.com/ and took it from there. I re-tagged it as promotional picture, as it is a promo picture for the movie, if it's not a screenie. That should do. Best regards, --Plumcouch 16:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Featured list removal candidates

I noticed recently that you nominated List of Indian districts for removal. Earlier, the old discussion, from a previous removal attempt was displaying. It was for that reason that I reverted your edits.

I have since seen that you wish to renominate it for removal. In that case, please revert your edits to the page for the current nomination because a record has to be kept of it. Move it to some appropriate place, such as Misplaced Pages:Featured list removal candidates/List of Indian districts/Archive 1. Then, write the new removal nomination at the redirect page. This way, a record of the old discussion is kept outside of the edit history. This is said in a different way at Misplaced Pages:Featured list removal candidates.

PS: I noticed that your username is Anwar Saadat. Since there is a real-life historical figure with the name Anwar Sadat, it would probably benefit you to either change your username or at least change your signature (preferences) because some people might think that it is an inappropriate username. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I am not sure if my daddy would be pleased if I change my (user)name. So that's out of the question. Aloan has been kind enough to revert, move and redirect the renomination as you said. I am not good at housekeeping. How to change my signature? Anwar saadat 15:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Would this help you? - Aksi_great (talk) 16:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I think I got it. Anwar 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)