| Revision as of 16:39, 1 March 2013 editFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 edits →Being back to editing as...: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 1 March 2013 edit undoFlyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 editsm →Being back to editing as...Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| == Being back to editing as... == | == Being back to editing as... == | ||
| ] has shown you great leniency; I wanted you to know that I am also part of the reason you have been shown this leniency. Spotting you the times that I did was easy, but I decided to discuss things with her first...which spared your behavior from being revealed to the Misplaced Pages community as behavior by Scientiom. I was not aware of every version, as I do not edit some articles that you edit. But, as you know, she has the power to be aware of every version. So, hopefully, you don't continue what you did. Because you felt that you were being harassed by a certain editor, that is one reason we understood why you resorted to what you did. Instead of emailing you about this at the moment, and without being vague, I decided to comment on your talk page about it while being vague because you have already been given a lot of non-transparency on this matter. I don't mind if you delete this section; I just wanted you to know that you have been given more leeway/chances than most others have been given. ] (]) 16:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | ] has shown you great leniency; I wanted you to know that I am also part of the reason you have been shown this leniency. Spotting you the times that I did was easy, but I decided to discuss things with her first...which spared your behavior from being revealed to the Misplaced Pages community as behavior by Scientiom. I was not aware of every version, as I do not edit some articles that you edit. But, as you know, she has the power to be aware of every version. So, hopefully, you don't continue what you did. Because you felt that you were being harassed by a certain editor, that is one reason we understood why you resorted to what you did. Instead of emailing you about this at the moment, and without being vague, I decided to comment on your talk page about it while being vague because you have already been given a lot of non-transparency on this matter. I don't mind if you delete this section; I just wanted you to know that you have been given more leeway/chances than most others have been given on a matter such as this. ] (]) 16:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 1 March 2013
Hatnote
I just added a hatnote to the SSM article. Does it address the concerns you mentioed yesterday? Pass a Method talk 18:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Just letting you know...
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Little green rosetta reported by User:StillStanding-247 (Result: ). Thank you. —StAnselm (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 19:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
I just wanted to drop by to welcome you back. We missed your contributions. Cheers. - MrX 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks! Now you made me hungry again - coincidentally I had a strawberry milkshake about 2 hours ago. Heh Heh. :P --Scientiom (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Being back to editing as...
Alison has shown you great leniency; I wanted you to know that I am also part of the reason you have been shown this leniency. Spotting you the times that I did was easy, but I decided to discuss things with her first...which spared your behavior from being revealed to the Misplaced Pages community as behavior by Scientiom. I was not aware of every version, as I do not edit some articles that you edit. But, as you know, she has the power to be aware of every version. So, hopefully, you don't continue what you did. Because you felt that you were being harassed by a certain editor, that is one reason we understood why you resorted to what you did. Instead of emailing you about this at the moment, and without being vague, I decided to comment on your talk page about it while being vague because you have already been given a lot of non-transparency on this matter. I don't mind if you delete this section; I just wanted you to know that you have been given more leeway/chances than most others have been given on a matter such as this. Flyer22 (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)