Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
*'''Support''' merger. The PAC is brand-new and always mentioned in connection with its parent organization. It isn't independently notable. ] (]) 04:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support''' merger. The PAC is brand-new and always mentioned in connection with its parent organization. It isn't independently notable. ] (]) 04:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Oppose:''' '''Hang on!''' This PAC is notable and has been created in response to ] and the ]. Please note that the ] article grew from this: to this: ] in a very short while. ] will do the same. In fact, I'm working on expanding the article right now. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither are any of the articles on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 18:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Oppose:''' '''Hang on!''' This PAC is notable and has been created in response to ] and the ]. Please note that the ] article grew from this: to this: ] in a very short while. ] will do the same. In fact, I'm working on expanding the article right now. Rome wasn't built in a day and neither are any of the articles on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 18:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Meh'''. The articles will probably be separate, eventually, but I'm not sure there's enough material yet. After merger, TPP would not be excessivly large, yet. — ] ] 20:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Revision as of 20:53, 3 March 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
I have reverted this edit because, while it added some information, it also screwed up the article formatting pretty badly. Some of the content might be worth adding back, though. MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 19:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Proposed merge
Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, a new stub related to this parent topic, was just created. I propose merging this stub into this smaller article to create a larger more thorough topic. Best practice is to merge two small articles about related topics. In this case, we have a PAC formed by the Tea Party Patriots. Is there any good reason this topic should not be handled in one article? Viriditas (talk) 03:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Support merger. The PAC is brand-new and always mentioned in connection with its parent organization. It isn't independently notable. Huon (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Meh. The articles will probably be separate, eventually, but I'm not sure there's enough material yet. After merger, TPP would not be excessivly large, yet. — Arthur Rubin(talk)20:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
