| Revision as of 15:01, 11 March 2013 editSonicyouth86 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,527 edits →Slow edit warring: ani notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:43, 11 March 2013 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,194 edits →Slow edit warringNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ::Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 15:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ::Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 15:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| CSDarrow, as an administrator, allow me to lecture you on the do's and don't's of Misplaced Pages. Do remain courteous: an editor comes here to notify you of the state of an article and its history, and you call him an "ignorant peasant". That is an ]. Furthermore, your edits on ] indicate that you view this place ], where you and another editor come out guns blazing, with little or no knowledge of guidelines regarding, for instance, ] and ]. So, coming from an editor who has as yet to show any regard for some core policies here, you'll forgive me for not buying into your "concern for Misplaced Pages". Continuing that kind of behavior is most likely to lead to a block, temporarily or indefinite. And more "peasant" remark, and more sneering about "puffed up little comments", will lead to a block as well. The article you sought out for editing has long suffered from soapboxing and battleground behavior, which is why Sonicyouth kindly notified you. Rather than cuss them out, you should thank them for their good faith: it seems they extended that much to you. Thank you. ] (]) 16:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:43, 11 March 2013
Note
Just a note to remove the red link from you talk page. You have taken a name that places the bar pretty high and I am hoping that you live up to it. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
A friendly notice
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Cailil 00:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Men's Rights Dispute
"Men's Rights Resolution Dispute"
Just making sure
...that I was right to do this. Cheers, Reyk YO! 06:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes that is fine. I am not sure what happened there, no idea how the signature got there. Ty. CSDarrow (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Always wondered how to do this.
Now I know.
Slow edit warring
Hello SCDarrow,
you appear to be edit warring against consensus found at Talk:Men's rights movement#Removal of Williams.2C 1995. I would also caution you against using misleading edit summaries as you did here when you wrote that you "moved" the material when in fact you rewrote and deleted parts of it against consensus and so that the text no longer matches the sources.
I see that you were informed that men's rights movement is on article probation. Please consider this a reminder. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Don't come into my talk page you ignorant peasant and lecture me on the do's and don't of Misplaced Pages. You actions on the Mens Rights site are appalling and are compromising the whole Misplaced Pages concept. Misplaced Pages is beginning to falter do due a lack of editors and Men's Rights is the flagship of that demise. I lay the blame fair and squarely on the likes of you for creating a hostile editing environment. Next time you come onto my talk page with your puffed up little comments perhaps a little introspection and concern for Misplaced Pages might be in order. CSDarrow (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
CSDarrow, as an administrator, allow me to lecture you on the do's and don't's of Misplaced Pages. Do remain courteous: an editor comes here to notify you of the state of an article and its history, and you call him an "ignorant peasant". That is an unacceptable personal attack. Furthermore, your edits on Talk:Men's rights movement indicate that you view this place as a battleground, where you and another editor come out guns blazing, with little or no knowledge of guidelines regarding, for instance, neutrality and Reliable sources. So, coming from an editor who has as yet to show any regard for some core policies here, you'll forgive me for not buying into your "concern for Misplaced Pages". Continuing that kind of behavior is most likely to lead to a block, temporarily or indefinite. And more "peasant" remark, and more sneering about "puffed up little comments", will lead to a block as well. The article you sought out for editing has long suffered from soapboxing and battleground behavior, which is why Sonicyouth kindly notified you. Rather than cuss them out, you should thank them for their good faith: it seems they extended that much to you. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)