| Revision as of 18:16, 22 March 2013 editPeterzor (talk | contribs)556 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 2 April 2013 edit undoDiannaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators350,277 edits →Notification of edit warring policy: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| <hr/> | <hr/> | ||
| {{wb|CsDix|Template:Infobox political party|nohello=on}} | {{wb|CsDix|Template:Infobox political party|nohello=on}} | ||
| == Notification of edit warring policy == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Please instead of edit warring discuss your proposed edits on the article talk page. -- ] (]) 19:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 2 April 2013
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". Thank you! EarwigBot 17:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Putin
Hello, I see you made a little of edits to the article today, about 6 of which were reverting yourself. If you're not sure of an edit, please use the preview function to check if you like it - otherwise the history of the article will get confusing. Thank you. Malick78 (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
You have a new message at CsDix's talk page.
Notification of edit warring policy
Your recent editing history at Nazi Germany shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please instead of edit warring discuss your proposed edits on the article talk page. -- Dianna (talk) 19:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)