| Revision as of 15:39, 4 April 2013 view sourceDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 edits Caution: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Eastern Orthodox Church. (TW★TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:30, 4 April 2013 view source Richwales (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators18,008 edits Warning: Edit warring on Eastern Orthodox Church. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| == April 2013 == | == April 2013 == | ||
| ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did to ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ''You are advised to leave personal comments attacking other users out of edit summaries.'' ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 15:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC) | ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did to ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ''You are advised to leave personal comments attacking other users out of edit summaries.'' ] <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">]</span></sup></small> 15:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ''<br><br>''If you believe your material is appropriate for inclusion in this or any other article, I would strongly recommend you bring it up for discussion at a suitable place (such as the ]). Even if this is in fact suitable material, it might be better placed in a more specialized article (such as ]). The main purpose of the ] article should be to describe the history, beliefs, and practices of the EOC — not to either defend or attack the EOC (i.e., no apologetics or polemics). It may be appropriate to <u>briefly</u> mention that icons have been controversial at various times amongst the church leadership — as shown, e.g., by the ]s of the 8th and 9th centuries AD — but any effort aimed at attacking the validity of the EOC or any other Christian group through lengthy arguments against the use of icons is misplaced in this article (and probably any other article).'' — ]] <small>''(no relation to Jimbo)''</small> 16:30, 4 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 4 April 2013
Re-use the sources
Hi, I added one of the citations for Covenant Reformed Baptist Church to the page Providence, Caswell County, North Carolina. I think it is appropriate in terms of WP:DUE. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic London 13:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Good. Thanks.Yeoberry (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
I'm a regular volunteer there. I reverted your listing because all listings there must be made via the button at the top of the page so that the maintenance bot that runs the page will work correctly. However, what you are requesting is a conduct dispute and DRN does not handle those. You need to go to ANI for that. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Eastern Orthodox Church. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. You are advised to leave personal comments attacking other users out of edit summaries. Δρ.Κ. 15:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eastern Orthodox Church. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
If you believe your material is appropriate for inclusion in this or any other article, I would strongly recommend you bring it up for discussion at a suitable place (such as the Reliable Sources Noticeboard). Even if this is in fact suitable material, it might be better placed in a more specialized article (such as Icon). The main purpose of the Eastern Orthodox Church article should be to describe the history, beliefs, and practices of the EOC — not to either defend or attack the EOC (i.e., no apologetics or polemics). It may be appropriate to briefly mention that icons have been controversial at various times amongst the church leadership — as shown, e.g., by the Byzantine Iconoclasms of the 8th and 9th centuries AD — but any effort aimed at attacking the validity of the EOC or any other Christian group through lengthy arguments against the use of icons is misplaced in this article (and probably any other article). — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 16:30, 4 April 2013 (UTC)