| Revision as of 23:51, 3 April 2013 editQwyrxian (talk | contribs)57,186 edits You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:53, 7 April 2013 edit undoMalick78 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,516 edits →Please don't edit war or be disruptive: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| == April 2013 == | == April 2013 == | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 days''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 23:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 days''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 23:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | ||
| == Please don't edit war or be disruptive == | |||
| Hello Peterzor, | |||
| it's nice to have you on Misplaced Pages but your seem to be disruptive. You reverted me for the umpteenth time, which I can take. I don't, however, like the fact that to give your reasoning. If your reasoning the previous times was legitimate, why change and speculate as to another editor's intentions by saying that those intentions have been fulfilled? | |||
| Worse, however, are you next 6 edits. You don't give edit summaries (very naughty!). And you repeated edits and self-reverts seem, I presume, to be intended to hide the major revert mentioned in my previous paragraph. If that is so, then you are being disruptive and may end up with another, hopefully longer, ban. | |||
| If I'm wrong and you're not being disruptive on purpose, then please modify your behaviour: give edit summaries and don't self-revert (or rather, use the 'preview' button). It's a courtesy to other editors. | |||
| Many thanks, ] (]) 20:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:53, 7 April 2013
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". Thank you! EarwigBot 17:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Putin
Hello, I see you made a little of edits to the article today, about 6 of which were reverting yourself. If you're not sure of an edit, please use the preview function to check if you like it - otherwise the history of the article will get confusing. Thank you. Malick78 (talk) 15:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
You have a new message at CsDix's talk page.
Deletion of notice
Why did you delete the recent notice advising you not to engage in edit warring? Malljaja (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Reported to edit warring notice board
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Dianna (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Please don't edit war or be disruptive
Hello Peterzor, it's nice to have you on Misplaced Pages but your recent edits seem to be disruptive. You reverted me for the umpteenth time, which I can take. I don't, however, like the fact that you used a different edit summary to give your reasoning. If your reasoning the previous times was legitimate, why change and speculate as to another editor's intentions by saying that those intentions have been fulfilled?
Worse, however, are you next 6 edits. You don't give edit summaries (very naughty!). And you repeated edits and self-reverts seem, I presume, to be intended to hide the major revert mentioned in my previous paragraph. If that is so, then you are being disruptive and may end up with another, hopefully longer, ban.
If I'm wrong and you're not being disruptive on purpose, then please modify your behaviour: give edit summaries and don't self-revert (or rather, use the 'preview' button). It's a courtesy to other editors.
Many thanks, Malick78 (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)