Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:15, 23 April 2013

Home	Talk Page	My Articles	Subpages	Userboxes	Contributions	Images

Welcome

Great Seljuq Empire

Since you have been editing the Great Seljuq Empire article, I thought I would ask your opinion. Currently the lede sentence is, "The Great Seljuq Empire (Persian: دولت سلجوقیان‎, Modern Turkish: Büyük Selçuklu Devleti) was a medieval Persianate,Turko-Persian Sunni Muslim empire, originating from the Qynyq branch of Oghuz Turks.
What do you think of the lede sentence being this, "The Great Seljuq Empire (Persian: دولت سلجوقیان‎, Modern Turkish: Büyük Selçuklu Devleti) was a medieval Sunni Muslim Persianate empire, originating from the Qynyq branch of Oghuz Turks."??
Since in the following paragraph, Turko-Persian is mentioned. Your thoughts? --Defensor Ursa 20:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dear Kansas Bear. Before I apologize for my late reply. I think it is more correct the following sentence, "The Great Seljuq Empire" (Persian: دولت سلجوقیان‎) was a medieval Persianate, Muslim Turkic empire, originating from the Qynyq branch of Oghuz Turks. --Qara Khan 17:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

"The Great Seljuq Empire" (Persian: دولت سلجوقیان‎) was a medieval Persianate, Muslim Turkic empire, originating from the Qynyq branch of Oghuz Turks.", looks good to me. --Defensor Ursa 12:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:History of Iran

See Template talk:History of Iran#Template size. I like the new view, but it's not collapsible. --Bejnar (talk) 00:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Check out some of my sub-user pages. ༆ (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Two suggestions

Hi Qara Van, I preseme that you're new to WP: Wellcome and thanks for the sidebox: History of the Turks pre-14th century. But I'd like to make two suggeations. The image is from the Tulip era of the Ottoman Empire which is in the 18th century, much later than pre 14th century. How about replacing it with a more a more coherent image. On the other hand the dynasties listed in China (and to some extend India) were immediatelly assimilated in the local population. I doubt if they can be called Turkic . How about discarding them ?Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Nedim Ardoğa. You are right in the first matter. The image comparatively is not appropriate. If you have good suggestion for the new image then change. I don't agree with you in the second matter. Shatuo turks, Mamluk dynasty, Khilji dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty no doubt was turkic origin. I understand why you doubt. Turkey historians think that Xiongnu, Golden Horde, Timurid, Mughal empires even Sumer was turkic :) Qara Khan 05:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit war

Hi Qara Han, as I have already remarked above, wellcome to WP. WP needs new editors and I am sure you be helpful in creating new articles and expanding the existing ones.But please note that edit war is not permitted in WP. (Besides it is a waste of time and energy for both editors) If you disagree with the other authors, please try to come to a compromise rather than to change the material. You can use the talk pages of the articles.

I am the creator of the page Chaghri Beg. Although this does not give a privilege, the page is on my watchlist. Adding a sidebox was a good idea of yours. But I don't agree with a few of your edits. I changed them back to their original form. But I am eager to discuss with you on the subject. Please see my talk on the talk page of the article. (Talk:Chaghri Beg) Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chaghri Beg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khorasan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

RV

Don't do this again! Why you are behave like this (semi-racism) in Iran articles (like this)? Mervzi (talk) 19:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Azerbaijan article is not Iran article. Learn the meaning of the word of Prehistory. Your edits in Azerbaijan article is persian propaganda. Misplaced Pages is not place of propaganda. Qara khan 14:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Please lay away Racist Thoughts. Mervzi (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I struggle to see how using only talk summaries and hurled insults on personal talk pages is a good strategy for resolving this issue. You two should take this dispute to the template talk page, possibly with an RfC and stop the senseless edit-warring. siafu (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

List of sultans of the Seljuq Empire

I thought I should let you know that Misplaced Pages articles can not reference other Misplaced Pages articles. Therefore this source; http://de.wikipedia.org/Seldschuken-F%C3%BCrsten#Stammbaum "Liste der Seldschuken-Fürsten", can not be used.

Other than that, I like the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kara-Khanid Khanate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turkic and Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Move of Bilge Qaghan

Hi, I see you moved Bilge Qaghan while a move discussion was still open at Talk:Bilge Qaghan#Requested move and seemed unlikely to succeed . I think this may have been a mistake, see Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure. Happy to help clean it up. Andrewa (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

History of the Turks

Yes, why you have to my change back? 85.110.81.188 (talk) 17:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Ottoman palaces

In case you don't know, edit war is not allowed in WP. For two times you deleted a table from the article Ottoman palaces in Istanbul which I've created. Unles you have a logical reason, you can't delete any encycloapedic content from the article. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

About what you said before.

Actually the Turks didn't rule Iran from 1029 to 1925, just wanted to tell you this so people wouldn't laugh at you or get angry at you if you said that in real life, take this as advice. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Template:History of the Turks pre-14th century

Discussion was closed by a third party. You cannot reverse it unilaterally.Cavann (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)