Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/European Esperanto Union: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:58, 16 May 2013 editJorisvS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers46,766 edits keep← Previous edit Revision as of 20:50, 16 May 2013 edit undoDream Focus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,010 edits European Esperanto UnionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' VanIsaac makes a good case. And the media does cover some of their activities, they worth mentioning surely. ] 20:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:50, 16 May 2013

European Esperanto Union

European Esperanto Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be a significant organization. Misplaced Pages isn't a dumping ground for every organization that has a small conference every couple of years or takes out an ad in a French paper. Article appears to be a permastub, and probably should be merged with another Esperanto article. A7 CSD was declined. pbp 16:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: I asked the editors of our Language Reference Desk to see if they can find any non-English sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is an active organization, with representation on European Commission integration platforms, and with relevance to the most important international auxiliary language in the world. A web search of the organization's actual name, instead of the English translation yields hundreds more results. The article can be significantly expanded to cover meetings and the linguistic developments arising from them, not to mention its continued involvement in larger discussions of European integration. VanIsaacWS Vex 23:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable organization. 86.128.5.222 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep per the above rationale. --JorisvS (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/European Esperanto Union: Difference between revisions Add topic