| Revision as of 19:11, 21 June 2013 edit82.212.85.176 (talk) →June 2013← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 21 June 2013 edit undoDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,441 edits →June 2013: thanks for the heads-upNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::Hmmm, seems there is a consensus and you appear to be ignoring it. Who's abusing the Sherlock Holmes page? Appears to be you. A complaint is being ledged on your abuse, I reviewed your history and you appear to dispute on a lot of things with people throughout the year on arguing with other users, so that I cannot trust you or agree with you. A block should be necessary on your account, that will help this problem. | ::Hmmm, seems there is a consensus and you appear to be ignoring it. Who's abusing the Sherlock Holmes page? Appears to be you. A complaint is being ledged on your abuse, I reviewed your history and you appear to dispute on a lot of things with people throughout the year on arguing with other users, so that I cannot trust you or agree with you. A block should be necessary on your account, that will help this problem. | ||
| :::I look forward to reviewing the complaint and offering my perspective then. In the meantime, the discussion hasn't even been posted for three days yet, so there is no consensus at this time. I would point out that at least one other editor has also been reverting your changes. | |||
| :::I advised you to comment at the article's Talk page. You should do so. ] (]) 19:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 21 June 2013
June 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, seems there is a consensus and you appear to be ignoring it. Who's abusing the Sherlock Holmes page? Appears to be you. A complaint is being ledged on your abuse, I reviewed your history and you appear to dispute on a lot of things with people throughout the year on arguing with other users, so that I cannot trust you or agree with you. A block should be necessary on your account, that will help this problem.
- I look forward to reviewing the complaint and offering my perspective then. In the meantime, the discussion hasn't even been posted for three days yet, so there is no consensus at this time. I would point out that at least one other editor has also been reverting your changes.
- I advised you to comment at the article's Talk page. You should do so. DonIago (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm, seems there is a consensus and you appear to be ignoring it. Who's abusing the Sherlock Holmes page? Appears to be you. A complaint is being ledged on your abuse, I reviewed your history and you appear to dispute on a lot of things with people throughout the year on arguing with other users, so that I cannot trust you or agree with you. A block should be necessary on your account, that will help this problem.