| Revision as of 21:59, 21 June 2013 editChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits Archive all but the last convo since they are done← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:26, 21 June 2013 edit undoLucia Black (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers17,382 edits →a small warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| : Kindly remove yourself from my page and take your negative and spiteful attitude with you. You filed frivolous ANIs on me; you've threatened me and other editors, you insert false material into articles and me citing diffs which show this are not "false assumptions". You claimed to "see red" when you see my name and you want "justice" on me are clear warning flags that you have no intention of working together and building an encyclopedia. This is example referring to me, "I hate that editor, and I hate that editor with a passion. I see that editors name on my talkpage and I see red." You think everything is personal. You tried to justify inserting false material and reverted my undo of said material. You make frequent references to justice and use references like "showing signs of defeat" in a content dispute which you deliberately added false references to. You make tacit reference to a lot of things, like DBZ being a proxy for GITS and your new "deletion campaign" where you goaded me in to thinking you had turned over a new leaf and understood the community at the VPP. Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me. I'm not taking your bait; from now on every necessary interaction will go through DRN or 3O because you have a personal grudge which you refuse to check. | : Kindly remove yourself from my page and take your negative and spiteful attitude with you. You filed frivolous ANIs on me; you've threatened me and other editors, you insert false material into articles and me citing diffs which show this are not "false assumptions". You claimed to "see red" when you see my name and you want "justice" on me are clear warning flags that you have no intention of working together and building an encyclopedia. This is example referring to me, "I hate that editor, and I hate that editor with a passion. I see that editors name on my talkpage and I see red." You think everything is personal. You tried to justify inserting false material and reverted my undo of said material. You make frequent references to justice and use references like "showing signs of defeat" in a content dispute which you deliberately added false references to. You make tacit reference to a lot of things, like DBZ being a proxy for GITS and your new "deletion campaign" where you goaded me in to thinking you had turned over a new leaf and understood the community at the VPP. Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me. I'm not taking your bait; from now on every necessary interaction will go through DRN or 3O because you have a personal grudge which you refuse to check. | ||
| :I've made a herculean effort to advise you, work with you and repair our relations only to be slapped with more attacks. Content should not suffer or be falsified because of personal grudges; I've extended the olive branch three times to you and your only response required me to lie and claim that I was destructive and mean as prerequisite to working together.You cleverly added that I do not have "beg"; just admit I "wronged you" and ask for your forgiveness... which would tacitly require me to admit to being a malicious/destructive editor. Then when a third party gets involved you reply with "Why should I work woth that editor? im done! Ive been pushed around too far with this editor and now he miraculously changes and expects me to work woth that editor!? NO!!!! GIVE ME WHAT I DESERVE OR YOULL SEE ME MAKE A BIGGER SCENE OR GET OUT!!!". I think that says volumes about yourself. I may disagree with you, but I don't hate you, but you clearly don't feel the same way. ] (]) 21:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | :I've made a herculean effort to advise you, work with you and repair our relations only to be slapped with more attacks. Content should not suffer or be falsified because of personal grudges; I've extended the olive branch three times to you and your only response required me to lie and claim that I was destructive and mean as prerequisite to working together.You cleverly added that I do not have "beg"; just admit I "wronged you" and ask for your forgiveness... which would tacitly require me to admit to being a malicious/destructive editor. Then when a third party gets involved you reply with "Why should I work woth that editor? im done! Ive been pushed around too far with this editor and now he miraculously changes and expects me to work woth that editor!? NO!!!! GIVE ME WHAT I DESERVE OR YOULL SEE ME MAKE A BIGGER SCENE OR GET OUT!!!". I think that says volumes about yourself. I may disagree with you, but I don't hate you, but you clearly don't feel the same way. ] (]) 21:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Im not going to argue. But what i say is true. Did I wrongly put you in ANI? Did you not make 3 edit wars over a subject you knew perfectly well there was no such consensus? Did you not use ad hominem and constantly bring WP:INCOMPETENCE? Do you not currently still poison discussions by bringing up the past and try to ruin another editors reputation by constantly bringing up irrelevant topics? Can you even answer "No" to every single one of these questions? | |||
| Remember, the only advantage you have is bringing up links. if I had a computer, every single edit youve done, I wouldve brought up aswell. If sorry implies that you admit destructiveness. Then whats rhe harm? You constantly call yourself a humble editor, but your worried about credit, bring up the large estimate of edits you made ironically when you mention humbleness and that youve written research papers. I have every reason and right to feel what I feel about you. But it doesnt matter when it coes to fixing articles. I bite my tongue till it bleeds if i have to, just to fix the article. If I got you banned over a small misunderstanding, then im prepared to be hated aswell. | |||
| regardless, im not going in DRN, its a tactic more than a resolution. There are more editors involved, so just me and ryulong isnt going to cut it. | |||
| Overall I didnt come here to defend or prove a poibt. "Small" warning. Dont bring me up and try to undermind, belittle, or defame me again. This is a warning.] (]) 22:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 21 June 2013
 Archives |
a small warning
You know that constantly bringing me up in a discussion and making false assumptions is poisoning the discussion. Even if you think its true. This is a warning. Im not going to bring you to ANI right away if it happens again, but I might be inclined to give a final warning next time.Lucia Black (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Kindly remove yourself from my page and take your negative and spiteful attitude with you. You filed frivolous ANIs on me; you've threatened me and other editors, you insert false material into articles and me citing diffs which show this are not "false assumptions". You claimed to "see red" when you see my name and you want "justice" on me are clear warning flags that you have no intention of working together and building an encyclopedia. This is example referring to me, "I hate that editor, and I hate that editor with a passion. I see that editors name on my talkpage and I see red." You think everything is personal. You tried to justify inserting false material and reverted my undo of said material. You make frequent references to justice and use references like "showing signs of defeat" in a content dispute which you deliberately added false references to. You make tacit reference to a lot of things, like DBZ being a proxy for GITS and your new "deletion campaign" where you goaded me in to thinking you had turned over a new leaf and understood the community at the VPP. Fool me once shame on you; fool me twice shame on me. I'm not taking your bait; from now on every necessary interaction will go through DRN or 3O because you have a personal grudge which you refuse to check.
- I've made a herculean effort to advise you, work with you and repair our relations only to be slapped with more attacks. Content should not suffer or be falsified because of personal grudges; I've extended the olive branch three times to you and your only response required me to lie and claim that I was destructive and mean as prerequisite to working together.You cleverly added that I do not have "beg"; just admit I "wronged you" and ask for your forgiveness... which would tacitly require me to admit to being a malicious/destructive editor. Then when a third party gets involved you reply with "Why should I work woth that editor? im done! Ive been pushed around too far with this editor and now he miraculously changes and expects me to work woth that editor!? NO!!!! GIVE ME WHAT I DESERVE OR YOULL SEE ME MAKE A BIGGER SCENE OR GET OUT!!!". I think that says volumes about yourself. I may disagree with you, but I don't hate you, but you clearly don't feel the same way. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Im not going to argue. But what i say is true. Did I wrongly put you in ANI? Did you not make 3 edit wars over a subject you knew perfectly well there was no such consensus? Did you not use ad hominem and constantly bring WP:INCOMPETENCE? Do you not currently still poison discussions by bringing up the past and try to ruin another editors reputation by constantly bringing up irrelevant topics? Can you even answer "No" to every single one of these questions?
Remember, the only advantage you have is bringing up links. if I had a computer, every single edit youve done, I wouldve brought up aswell. If sorry implies that you admit destructiveness. Then whats rhe harm? You constantly call yourself a humble editor, but your worried about credit, bring up the large estimate of edits you made ironically when you mention humbleness and that youve written research papers. I have every reason and right to feel what I feel about you. But it doesnt matter when it coes to fixing articles. I bite my tongue till it bleeds if i have to, just to fix the article. If I got you banned over a small misunderstanding, then im prepared to be hated aswell.
regardless, im not going in DRN, its a tactic more than a resolution. There are more editors involved, so just me and ryulong isnt going to cut it.
Overall I didnt come here to defend or prove a poibt. "Small" warning. Dont bring me up and try to undermind, belittle, or defame me again. This is a warning.Lucia Black (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)