| Revision as of 22:15, 2 July 2013 editDoc9871 (talk | contribs)23,298 edits →Give it up Doc9871: f← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:22, 2 July 2013 edit undoTepido (talk | contribs)13 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: ] ] 18:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC) :What new user watchlists the talkpage of the user that filed the last SPI? None. You are Koov, and the other editors will see that as easily as I did. Sad. ] ] 22:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC) I am not the banned user:Koov Doc9871. You gave no evidence thus far. You continue to attack me because you are a very rude man. I believe that the real reason I had watchlisted the talkpage because you had no right to claim that I am Koov. You decided to attack me based on no evidence. Sad! No you are pathetic Doc9871. Just leave me alone. ] ] 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:22, 2 July 2013
Sock edits can be reverted on sight
As a sock of Koov, I can revert anything you post, and any edit you make. The block will be coming, so I suggest you give up the game. Cheers. Doc talk 22:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Give it up Doc9871
You still couldn't prove to me that I am the banned user Koov. So you give up your lies and leave me alone. You are the liar here. Cheers give it up Englishman. I am not the user:koov. I don't even know who that person is. User:Tepido Tepido 18:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- What new user watchlists the talkpage of the user that filed the last SPI? None. You are Koov, and the other editors will see that as easily as I did. Sad. Doc talk 22:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
I am not the banned user:Koov Doc9871. You gave no evidence thus far. You continue to attack me because you are a very rude man. I believe that the real reason I had watchlisted the talkpage because you had no right to claim that I am Koov. You decided to attack me based on no evidence. Sad! No you are pathetic Doc9871. Just leave me alone. User:Tepido talk 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)