Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2013 July 22: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:00, 22 July 2013 editAntidiskriminator (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers58,480 edits →File:Chetniks trampling the Nazi German flag.jpeg: cmt← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:45, 22 July 2013 edit undoFkpCascais (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers72,551 edits →File:Chetniks trampling the Nazi German flag.jpeg: cNext edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:
	I'm sure this was uploaded in good faith. However, it's a presumably non-free photo with no author or source information available, and it's used in an article in a decorative way. Violation of ] and #10. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 14:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)		I'm sure this was uploaded in good faith. However, it's a presumably non-free photo with no author or source information available, and it's used in an article in a decorative way. Violation of ] and #10. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 14:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
	*'''Comment''': I uploaded this image. is the source. The image is used to illustrate position of some Chetniks toward Wermacht, not for decoration.--] (]) 15:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)		*'''Comment''': I uploaded this image. is the source. The image is used to illustrate position of some Chetniks toward Wermacht, not for decoration.--] (]) 15:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' - Some editors made such a major effort in bringing pictures about the aspect of Chetnik collaboration with Nazis, that there is a major need here on en.wiki to find pictures that show their resistance position (after all, they were a resistance moviment). Calling this "decorative" is out of context and wrong. ] (]) 15:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:45, 22 July 2013

< July 21	July 23 >

July 22

File:Orwell Signature.png

Obsoleted by Vector. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Xlrecordingslogo.jpg

Obsoleted by vector, seemingly unused. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Cache,basic.png

Obsoleted by vector, seemingly unused. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Cache,associative-read.png

Obsoleted by vector, seemingly unused. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Gold Mining at K.G.F., India.jpg

Delete: this 1980 Indian postage stamp is copyright for 60 years per commons:Commons:Stamps/Public domain#India and fails WP:NFCC#8 as there is no critical commentary about the stamps itself. The fact that the stamp was issued to commemorate this topic can easily be explained by prose alone without the need for a non-free image. It also fails WP:NFCI #3. ww2censor (talk) 09:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:2005 USPostal ChaChaCha Stamp.jpg

Delete: This 2005 USPS issued stamp is still in copyright and clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the stamp itself. The fact that it was issued is already well explained in the prose and is not necessary for the reader to understand it. If there were sourced critical commentary about the stamp to justify it inclusion, it might pass NFCC. ww2censor (talk) 09:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Boy and Girl Scouting begins Celebrate the Century stamp.jpg

Delete: Non-free image removed from Scouting in popular culture and replaced with a free image File:Australianstamp 1590.jpg from the commons as this one failed WP:NFCC#1 (it was replaceable) and WP:NFCC#8 (there was no critical commentary that would justify its inclusion). There are several free images available even though not many have been uploaded. ww2censor (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Lion Stamp (US Postage).png

Delete: This 2000 USPS issued stamp is still in copyright and clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the stamp itself and is used just as a decorative illustration. The fact that it was issued could easily be explained in the prose and the non-free stamp image not necessary for the reader to understand that fact. If there were sourced critical commentary about the stamp to justify it inclusion, it might pass NFCC. ww2censor (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Steiner postage stamp.gif

Delete: This 1999 USPS issued stamp is still in copyright and clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the stamp itself. The fact that it was issued is already well explained in the prose and the use of a non-free image is not necessary for the reader to understand that. It also fails WP:NFC#UUI #3 because it is used to illustrate the subject of the stamp and is not used in a stamp article about that stamp. ww2censor (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:US Postage Stamp Monitor & Virginia.jpg

Delete: This 1995 USPS issued stamp is still in copyright and clearly fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no critical commentary about the stamp itself. The fact that it was issued could be well explained in the prose and is not necessary for the reader to understand that fact. It is just used a decoration and also fails WP:NFC#UUI #3 as it is used to illustrate the subject of the image. If there were sourced critical commentary about the stamp itself to justify its inclusion, it might pass NFCC though I feel that is unlikely. ww2censor (talk) 09:56, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Chetniks trampling the Nazi German flag.jpeg

I'm sure this was uploaded in good faith. However, it's a presumably non-free photo with no author or source information available, and it's used in an article in a decorative way. Violation of WP:NFCC#8 and #10. – Quadell 14:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Comment: I uploaded this image. This book is the source. The image is used to illustrate position of some Chetniks toward Wermacht, not for decoration.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep - Some editors made such a major effort in bringing pictures about the aspect of Chetnik collaboration with Nazis, that there is a major need here on en.wiki to find pictures that show their resistance position (after all, they were a resistance moviment). Calling this "decorative" is out of context and wrong. FkpCascais (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)