| Revision as of 17:44, 21 July 2013 view sourceTide rolls (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled219,196 editsm →Beyond disagreement: grammar← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:28, 22 July 2013 view source DrFleischman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,325 edits →Rand PaulNext edit → | ||
| Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
| :I will if you will. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | :I will if you will. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Ok. It's a deal. :) --] (]) 23:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | ::Ok. It's a deal. :) --] (]) 23:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :You your promise. I'm debating whether to raise this at ANI. What do you think? --] (]) 18:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == self defense == | == self defense == | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 22 July 2013
 | The Rabbit Ration Committee and the Commissioner of Bugsball have permitted admisistrators to impose rabbit-harey templates on any editor editing this page or associated pages. Rabbitrary templates can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhare to the purpose of Wabbipedia, any expected standards of beehiviour, or any normal editorial process. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wabbipedia:Rabbit Ration Committee/rabbit-harey templates, with the appropriate sections of Bugipedia:Harebbitration Committee/Procedures, with the Rules of Baseball and with the case decision page. |
 | This is not a forum for general discussion of User:Baseball Bugs Any such comments may be refractured or tossed into the bit bucket. Please limit discussion to improvement of articles and of User:Baseball Bugs. You may wish to ask factual questions about User:Baseball Bugs, discuss relevant User:Baseball Bugs policies, or ask for help, at User talk:Baseball Bugs. |
 | Please be neuter when writing on this highly sentient page. It discusses a topic about which editors may have many |
 | This page may be protected against editing by new users. If you cannot edit here, you may leave a message at my unprotected talk page. If it's urgent, please mark it "URGENT", so that I can start ignoring it immediately. |  |
|
Transients welcome
| Acme© Certified | ||
|---|---|---|
Click here to LOG OUT: Special:Userlogout
|
"Train leaving on Track Five for Anaheim, Azusa, and Cuc.....
| This digression has been anchovyied. Please do not muddify it. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
.jpg)
Wikipe-tan's advice to trolls, vandals, Republicans, and other malcontents:
"Don't be a 
oser!"
Go, and Wiki-sin no more!
ANI (though not to worry)
I mentioned your name here at AN/I in a thread about User:Capt S D Wong. Chris857 (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- "Oldies but baddies." ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 15:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Rand Paul
Re this discussion, I'm not sure how you can call Rand Paul a "true libertarian" given his stance on abortion. (P.S. Can we please try to keep this sort of clutter off the talk page?) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- I will if you will. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 22:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. It's a deal. :) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- You broke your promise. I'm debating whether to raise this at ANI. What do you think? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
self defense
Totally anecdotal, but I heard some pundit say that self-defense as defined under the stand-your-ground law did not at all take into account anything such as the "defender's" prior provocative actions. Hence the stalk-provoke part of the stalk-provoke-kill sequence would have been blocked by the defense team as irrelevant under that law. I have no idea if that's actually the case. Isn't it comforting to know Z is perhaps back on the streets tonight, looking for more aholes to make sure they don't effing get away with it? μηδείς (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- You misspelled "asshole". I can't begin to emphasise enough the importance of using good proper form and grammar. SlightSmile 00:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Beyond disagreement
My post stated the opposite of your assertion. Maybe Misplaced Pages is ridiculed because positions are mischaracterized and molehills are presented as mountains. Tiderolls 17:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)