| Revision as of 09:48, 3 June 2006 view sourceMeco (talk | contribs)53,690 edits →{{Lut|JackSarfatti}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:15, 3 June 2006 view source VoABot (talk | contribs)Bots29,709 editsm BOT - Removing old fullfilled/denied requests. Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ###############Please only edit below this line.############--> | ###############Please only edit below this line.############--> | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{la|Maładečna}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{la|Maładečna}}==== | ||
| '''Move protection'''. A straw poll was held to determine the name of the article and there was no compromise to move it to ], but a bunch of editors are moving it anyway - without even mentioning it at the talk page. Perhaps a day or two would make them join the discussion at the talk page. ''<font color="#990011">//</font>'']] 09:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | '''Move protection'''. A straw poll was held to determine the name of the article and there was no compromise to move it to ], but a bunch of editors are moving it anyway - without even mentioning it at the talk page. Perhaps a day or two would make them join the discussion at the talk page. ''<font color="#990011">//</font>'']] 09:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Move-protected'''. ] (]) 09:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | :'''Move-protected'''. ] (]) 09:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Anaheim Hills, California}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Anaheim Hills, California}}==== | ||
| '''Full protection'''. Although ] is protected (as mentioned below) due to a move war, the editor in the dispute is also using IP addresses to evade the protection and cut and paste the content onto the page. ] ] 02:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | '''Full protection'''. Although ] is protected (as mentioned below) due to a move war, the editor in the dispute is also using IP addresses to evade the protection and cut and paste the content onto the page. ] ] 02:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Protected'''. ] (]) 02:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | :'''Protected'''. ] (]) 02:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California}}==== | ||
| '''Move protection'''. A straw poll was held regarding the article title, but one editor insists on moving it to a different name. -] 01:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | '''Move protection'''. A straw poll was held regarding the article title, but one editor insists on moving it to a different name. -] 01:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Done. -- ] ] ] ] ] 01:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | :Done. -- ] ] ] ] ] 01:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Emma Watson}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Emma Watson}}==== | ||
| '''Full Protection''' Already semied. Right after semi-protection users begin to start vandalizing the page meaning that the page should be Fully Protected. ] | '''Full Protection''' Already semied. Right after semi-protection users begin to start vandalizing the page meaning that the page should be Fully Protected. ] | ||
| :Too quiet at the moment. ''']''' (]) <em><strong>]</strong></em> 22:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | :Too quiet at the moment. ''']''' (]) <em><strong>]</strong></em> 22:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Beta Theta Pi}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|Beta Theta Pi}}==== | ||
| '''Semi-protection''': This page is in a revert war over content in one section. Previously the edits were coming from one anonymous user, but it appears a second one has entered the fray and made the problem worse. (Homosexuals are now being classified as "infamous" members.) Contributions from these contributors are often not NPOV. Further, one anonymous user has recently threatened to draw additional parties into the revert war, which he may have just done. Registered users have been fine. ] 21:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | '''Semi-protection''': This page is in a revert war over content in one section. Previously the edits were coming from one anonymous user, but it appears a second one has entered the fray and made the problem worse. (Homosexuals are now being classified as "infamous" members.) Contributions from these contributors are often not NPOV. Further, one anonymous user has recently threatened to draw additional parties into the revert war, which he may have just done. Registered users have been fine. ] 21:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Done. -- ] ] ] ] ] 01:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | :Done. -- ] ] ] ] ] 01:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ==Current requests for unprotection== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{ |
||
| '''Semi-protection''' against repeated vandalism. This has been a target for anonymous vandals since I started with Misplaced Pages. On the other hand, the content has been quite stable; not much news going on on the Eli Whitney front these days. Of the past 50 edits, there have been 34 anonymous vandalisms, 15 reverts, and 1 category addition. ] 19:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, not enough activity. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 22:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ==Current requests for unprotection== | ||
| ''If you simply want to make spelling corrections or add information to a protected page that is not disputed, and you are not involved in any disputes there, consider simply adding <nowiki>{{Editprotected}}</nowiki> to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page.'' | ''If you simply want to make spelling corrections or add information to a protected page that is not disputed, and you are not involved in any disputes there, consider simply adding <nowiki>{{Editprotected}}</nowiki> to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page.'' | ||
| Line 55: | Line 45: | ||
| etc.). | etc.). | ||
| ###############Please only edit below this line.###############--> | ###############Please only edit below this line.###############--> ===={{La|Kobe Bryant}}==== | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La| |
||
| The main reason for the protection was due to the edits of one particular user. This user has seemed to have left and does not appear to prove much of a problem anymore. The page has been protected for near a month now and it should be opened up. ] 2 June 2006 (UTC) | The main reason for the protection was due to the edits of one particular user. This user has seemed to have left and does not appear to prove much of a problem anymore. The page has been protected for near a month now and it should be opened up. ] 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Unprotected'''. ] (]) 23:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | :'''Unprotected'''. ] (]) 23:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC) ====]==== | ||
| ====]==== | |||
| i think its the coast is clear now.] 22:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | i think its the coast is clear now.] 22:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Unprotected''' (Note: the page to be unprotected was actually ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | :'''Unprotected''' (Note: the page to be unprotected was actually ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{Lut|JackSarfatti}}==== | ||
| ===={{Lut|JackSarfatti}}==== | |||
| The user is indefinitely banned. However, this page protect hinders renewed discussion about the user's WP track record and possible arguments contrary to the status quo. __] 20:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | The user is indefinitely banned. However, this page protect hinders renewed discussion about the user's WP track record and possible arguments contrary to the status quo. __] 20:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *My feelings are it should remain protected. If you feel that there is some aspect of Sarfatti's history that needs to be discussed, it should probably be on the ] or ] (since I can only assume that "arguments contrary to the status quo" means "arguments as to why he should not be indefblocked"). ] 20:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | *My feelings are it should remain protected. If you feel that there is some aspect of Sarfatti's history that needs to be discussed, it should probably be on the ] or ] (since I can only assume that "arguments contrary to the status quo" means "arguments as to why he should not be indefblocked"). ] 20:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 70: | Line 57: | ||
| ::Why should a user who is indefblocked and who tended to on their talk page after their block be allowed a venue? '''Denied'''. ] 21:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ::Why should a user who is indefblocked and who tended to on their talk page after their block be allowed a venue? '''Denied'''. ] 21:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::The user is banned. THAT is the sanction against said person. Protecting a talk page prohibits ''all other users'' from voicing their opinions with regards to the implemented restrictions. This request which I am currently arguing is even hampered as none of the users watching the protected talk page are notified of this request. It's like having a democracy without allowing announcements of rallies. __] 09:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | :::The user is banned. THAT is the sanction against said person. Protecting a talk page prohibits ''all other users'' from voicing their opinions with regards to the implemented restrictions. This request which I am currently arguing is even hampered as none of the users watching the protected talk page are notified of this request. It's like having a democracy without allowing announcements of rallies. __] 09:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ===={{La|killridemedly}}==== | ||
| ===={{La|killridemedly}}==== | |||
| The majority of the article vandalism comes from mad Howard Stern fans. Rivals will always have bad blood for each other, so it's useless to have a protected page for Opie and Anthony. Either protect it until Opie and Anthony go off air or remove the lock. ] 20:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | The majority of the article vandalism comes from mad Howard Stern fans. Rivals will always have bad blood for each other, so it's useless to have a protected page for Opie and Anthony. Either protect it until Opie and Anthony go off air or remove the lock. ] 20:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Umm... there's no article by that name. If you can get the correct article name for me, I'll gladly take a look. ] (]) 03:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | :Umm... there's no article by that name. If you can get the correct article name for me, I'll gladly take a look. ] (]) 03:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:15, 3 June 2006
| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit | ||
 Archives |
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for protection
Request either semi-protection, full protection, or move protection by placing it in bold text (add ''' before and after a word to make it bold) at the beginning of your statement. ====Maładečna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== Move protection. A straw poll was held to determine the name of the article and there was no compromise to move it to Maladzechna, but a bunch of editors are moving it anyway - without even mentioning it at the talk page. Perhaps a day or two would make them join the discussion at the talk page. //Halibutt 09:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Move-protected. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
====Anaheim Hills, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== Full protection. Although Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California is protected (as mentioned below) due to a move war, the editor in the dispute is also using IP addresses to evade the protection and cut and paste the content onto the page. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Protected. AmiDaniel (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
====Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== Move protection. A straw poll was held regarding the article title, but one editor insists on moving it to a different name. -Will Beback 01:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
====Emma Watson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)====
Full Protection Already semied. Right after semi-protection users begin to start vandalizing the page meaning that the page should be Fully Protected. ForestH2
- Too quiet at the moment. Will (@) T 22:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
====Beta Theta Pi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== Semi-protection: This page is in a revert war over content in one section. Previously the edits were coming from one anonymous user, but it appears a second one has entered the fray and made the problem worse. (Homosexuals are now being classified as "infamous" members.) Contributions from these contributors are often not NPOV. Further, one anonymous user has recently threatened to draw additional parties into the revert war, which he may have just done. Registered users have been fine. Pat 21:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
==Current requests for unprotection== If you simply want to make spelling corrections or add information to a protected page that is not disputed, and you are not involved in any disputes there, consider simply adding {{Editprotected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page.
====Kobe Bryant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== The main reason for the protection was due to the edits of one particular user. This user has seemed to have left and does not appear to prove much of a problem anymore. The page has been protected for near a month now and it should be opened up. Duhon 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Unprotected. AmiDaniel (talk) 23:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC) ====wwe====
i think its the coast is clear now.SPOV 22:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Unprotected (Note: the page to be unprotected was actually World Wrestling Entertainment. Prodego 22:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
====User talk:JackSarfatti (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)==== The user is indefinitely banned. However, this page protect hinders renewed discussion about the user's WP track record and possible arguments contrary to the status quo. __meco 20:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- My feelings are it should remain protected. If you feel that there is some aspect of Sarfatti's history that needs to be discussed, it should probably be on the WP:ANI or WP:AN (since I can only assume that "arguments contrary to the status quo" means "arguments as to why he should not be indefblocked"). Syrthiss 20:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Limiting the medium for bringing up such a discussion to the administrators' noticeboard is exquisitley non-transparent. My ground for making this proposal is however that a protect is a measure that should not be kept lingering, like in this case. __meco 21:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why should a user who is indefblocked and who tended to soapbox on their talk page after their block be allowed a venue? Denied. Syrthiss 21:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- The user is banned. THAT is the sanction against said person. Protecting a talk page prohibits all other users from voicing their opinions with regards to the implemented restrictions. This request which I am currently arguing is even hampered as none of the users watching the protected talk page are notified of this request. It's like having a democracy without allowing announcements of rallies. __meco 09:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why should a user who is indefblocked and who tended to soapbox on their talk page after their block be allowed a venue? Denied. Syrthiss 21:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
====Killridemedly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)==== The majority of the article vandalism comes from mad Howard Stern fans. Rivals will always have bad blood for each other, so it's useless to have a protected page for Opie and Anthony. Either protect it until Opie and Anthony go off air or remove the lock. killridemedly 20:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Umm... there's no article by that name. If you can get the correct article name for me, I'll gladly take a look. AmiDaniel (talk) 03:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- The article would be Opie and Anthony. Prodego 19:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Current requests for significant edits to a protected page
Please demonstrate a good reason for an edit to a protected page. These are only done in exceptional circumstances, or when there is very clear consensus for an edit and continued protection. Please link to the talk page where consensus was reached.
You may also add {{Editprotected}} to the article's talk page if you would like an inconsequential change of some kind made, but note that most of these should simply wait for unprotection.