| Revision as of 14:52, 3 June 2006 editNichalp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers28,407 edits not a copyvio← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:34, 3 June 2006 edit undoImpuMozhi (talk | contribs)5,181 edits never know how things will sound when readNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *]. Note that two different versions of the image seem to exist on the same page. Both seem to be from website. is the cache, scroll to "monuments" and click. Pictures 1 & 3 are the two versions found on Misplaced Pages. Notice on the page containing photographs says "Copyright @ 2005 BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha. All rights reserved." (If the website does not open, use the path: Akshardham.com, then select "photo gallery", then select "Monuments"). Regards, ] 14:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | *]. Note that two different versions of the image seem to exist on the same page. Both seem to be from website. is the cache, scroll to "monuments" and click. Pictures 1 & 3 are the two versions found on Misplaced Pages. Notice on the page containing photographs says "Copyright @ 2005 BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha. All rights reserved." (If the website does not open, use the path: Akshardham.com, then select "photo gallery", then select "Monuments"). Regards, ] 14:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *:Direct link to image gallery: —] (]) 16:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | *:Direct link to image gallery: —] (]) 16:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *:It doesn't look like a copyvio to me. I'm assuming that you are comparing Image#2 in the gallery with this one. I've noticed some inconsistencies: 1. Notice the angles both are taken from and the shadows. they don't match. 2. The gallery one seems to be taken in a winter's evening, while WP one is during earlier during the day. 3. People are also different. There are some people with red in the centre, the other has them missing. ] ] 14:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | *::It doesn't look like a copyvio to me. I'm assuming that you are comparing Image#2 in the gallery with this one. I've noticed some inconsistencies: 1. Notice the angles both are taken from and the shadows. they don't match. 2. The gallery one seems to be taken in a winter's evening, while WP one is during earlier during the day. 3. People are also different. There are some people with red in the centre, the other has them missing. ] ] 14:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *:::Look at the people, comparing with . Please blow up website image, second from left in second row, by clicking on it. There are two ladies in red shawls under the row of elephants, a man in yellow jacket a little to their left, the crowd further leftward, ending with the dark-garmented man bending over the white-shirted one. What are the chances of a 100 people falling into the same poses on two occasions? ] 15:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:34, 3 June 2006
editImages
- Image:Central line train interior.JPG (history · last edit) from 62.56.72.83 13:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Yak-28PP 3-view.gif (history · last edit). Original source unknown but IMO pushing it for Fair Use. - Emt147 14:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Argylemap.JPG (history · last edit) from . Dr Zak 15:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Shakespeare effigy.jpg (history · last edit) from . Geni 16:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- This was improperly tagged with {{GFDL}}. I've retagged the image appropriately to {{Fair use in}}. I think this adequately satisfies the requirements for inclusion in William Shakespeare. --Durin 16:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- de.wikipedia has a free replacement at de:Bild:Stratford_Holy_Trinity_Church3.jpg. Replacing the copyrighted image with the free equivalent might in this particular case be a Stallmanesque insistence on principles. Sorry. Dr Zak 01:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Harbor.jpg (history · last edit) from . —Bkell 22:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Akshardhamindelhi.jpg is clearly from this website -- note, the people in foreground are the same. Someone has managed to erase the website logo. Does that render the photograph "my creation??" The uploader (very few contributions) has claimed it as his own creation. ImpuMozhi 22:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seems more likely to me that it's the other way around—behindwoods.com added their logo to the picture. We seem to have a version of the image before the logo was added. Removing those logos would be very difficult, especially the clapperboard; if the uploader removed that clapperboard, he would have had to invent the people standing behind it, and the detail of the building. In addition, the version on Misplaced Pages has a higher resolution. To me it seems almost certain that the image on Misplaced Pages is not taken from behindwoods.com. If it's a copyright violation, it must have been taken from another site. Or maybe it's not a copyright violation at all—do you have evidence that behindwoods.com didn't take their image from Misplaced Pages? Or that the person who uploaded the image to Misplaced Pages wasn't the same person who uploaded it to behindwoods.com? —Bkell 02:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- A much more likely source is . —Bkell 03:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Right, I agree with the assessment of sequence. Thanks so much for taking the trouble! Now there is a second version on the same page, and that is also a copyvio. Here is a website with both photos. Hence I am revising the report below. Thanx again, ImpuMozhi 14:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- A much more likely source is . —Bkell 03:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seems more likely to me that it's the other way around—behindwoods.com added their logo to the picture. We seem to have a version of the image before the logo was added. Removing those logos would be very difficult, especially the clapperboard; if the uploader removed that clapperboard, he would have had to invent the people standing behind it, and the detail of the building. In addition, the version on Misplaced Pages has a higher resolution. To me it seems almost certain that the image on Misplaced Pages is not taken from behindwoods.com. If it's a copyright violation, it must have been taken from another site. Or maybe it's not a copyright violation at all—do you have evidence that behindwoods.com didn't take their image from Misplaced Pages? Or that the person who uploaded the image to Misplaced Pages wasn't the same person who uploaded it to behindwoods.com? —Bkell 02:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Akshardhamindelhi.jpg. Note that two different versions of the image seem to exist on the same page. Both seem to be from this website. Here is the cache, scroll to "monuments" and click. Pictures 1 & 3 are the two versions found on Misplaced Pages. Notice on the page containing photographs says "Copyright @ 2005 BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha. All rights reserved." (If the website does not open, use the path: Akshardham.com, then select "photo gallery", then select "Monuments"). Regards, ImpuMozhi 14:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Direct link to image gallery: —Bkell (talk) 16:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like a copyvio to me. I'm assuming that you are comparing Image#2 in the gallery with this one. I've noticed some inconsistencies: 1. Notice the angles both are taken from and the shadows. they don't match. 2. The gallery one seems to be taken in a winter's evening, while WP one is during earlier during the day. 3. People are also different. There are some people with red in the centre, the other has them missing. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Look at the people, comparing this with this. Please blow up website image, second from left in second row, by clicking on it. There are two ladies in red shawls under the row of elephants, a man in yellow jacket a little to their left, the crowd further leftward, ending with the dark-garmented man bending over the white-shirted one. What are the chances of a 100 people falling into the same poses on two occasions? ImpuMozhi 15:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like a copyvio to me. I'm assuming that you are comparing Image#2 in the gallery with this one. I've noticed some inconsistencies: 1. Notice the angles both are taken from and the shadows. they don't match. 2. The gallery one seems to be taken in a winter's evening, while WP one is during earlier during the day. 3. People are also different. There are some people with red in the centre, the other has them missing. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Direct link to image gallery: —Bkell (talk) 16:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
