| Revision as of 23:01, 7 August 2013 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,573,427 edits (BOT) New discussion page: 2013 August 8. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/DRVClerk | Revision as of 00:59, 8 August 2013 edit undoErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,276 edits entryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | ||
| ====]==== | |||
| :{{DRV links|Elexis Monroe|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Elexis Monroe|article=}} | |||
| I believe this article was deleted for an inaccurate reason. What complicated things is that the relevant guideline it satisfied, ], was under discussion at the time, and it was thus interpreted to not be a valid guideline for proving notability (btw, that guideline ended up not being changed at all). I contacted the original admin who deleted the article about it before I realized that s/he is on vacation, so I re-created the article with an explanation as to why I did so...because the subject passes point #1 of PORNBIO: having been nominated for two non-scene-related awards in multiple years (Acting Performance of the Year - Female in 2011 and MILF Performer of the Year in 2012). Still, another admin deleted the article without warning earlier today, and attempts to get him/her to even userfy the article were unsuccessful, so I brought it here. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 00:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:59, 8 August 2013
< 2013 August 7 Deletion review archives: 2013 August 2013 August 9 >8 August 2013
Elexis Monroe
I believe this article was deleted for an inaccurate reason. What complicated things is that the relevant guideline it satisfied, WP:PORNBIO, was under discussion at the time, and it was thus interpreted to not be a valid guideline for proving notability (btw, that guideline ended up not being changed at all). I contacted the original admin who deleted the article about it before I realized that s/he is on vacation, so I re-created the article with an explanation as to why I did so...because the subject passes point #1 of PORNBIO: having been nominated for two non-scene-related awards in multiple years (Acting Performance of the Year - Female in 2011 and MILF Performer of the Year in 2012). Still, another admin deleted the article without warning earlier today, and attempts to get him/her to even userfy the article were unsuccessful, so I brought it here. Erpert 00:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)