Revision as of 18:10, 7 August 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 7d) to User talk:Plarem/Archive 2.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:34, 8 August 2013 edit undoManish 8726 (talk | contribs)12 edits →swaminarayn articlesNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
] (]) 04:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | ] (]) 04:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
:No, because that would be against Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Thanks. – <span style="background-color:turquoise;color:yellow;">Plarem</span> <sup>(] ])</sup> 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | :No, because that would be against Misplaced Pages's ] policy. Thanks. – <span style="background-color:turquoise;color:yellow;">Plarem</span> <sup>(] ])</sup> 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
== swaminarayn articles == | |||
Ok '''If this post will not remove within week i will file case in court against you.and i will take action against you.'''than you ask about page that removed by me with my lawyer. | |||
] (]) 03:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:34, 8 August 2013
Status: Online
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please note before adding anything
|
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
File permission problem with File:2 euro coin from 2007 reverse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2 euro coin from 2007 reverse.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Euro banknotes
The article Euro banknotes you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Euro banknotes for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Retrolord -- Retrolord (talk) 02:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euro banknotes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberthur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Justice at Stake Page
Plarem, I am in the midst of editing the Justice at Stake page. I am familiar with this organization and a great deal of the information on the page is either outdated or not backed by references. I am not vandalizing the page, but rather ensuring that the information on the page is only that which is substantiated by valid research sources. I stated as much in my summary section. This is the second time that I have gotten flagged for vandalizing this page when I have simply been trying to clarify the language and delete content that has no citations. Is there anything that I can do differently to show that my intentions are good? Thank you, Laurabeth hooper (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, so, you could:
- Do it one bit at a time, so that your edits don't delete too much content in one go. The reason I thought your edit was vandalism is because you're a new editor, and you're on the Contributions page for newly registered editors, and I thought that that was section blanking.
- You can delete content and add new content in the same edit.
- Or block capitals in the edit summary 'DO NOT REVERT THIS'.
If you have any more problems, feel free to let me know. – Plarem 21:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Maria Perceval
i made changes to the page of maria cristina perceval without letting you know that i made them, because the page was outdated. can you restore what i put up this morning, including the picture_ i will make sure next time i let you know why i made those changes. kindly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mision argentina (talk • contribs) 15:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Manish 8726
hi my self manish. i request to you that please remove immediately your post about criticism of swaminarayan page.it is a totally fake information given by you.i have all the proof about swaminarayn.he do not make any injustice. your postleads to hurt feelings of all Indians and bhakta.
Manish 8726 (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- No, because that would be against Misplaced Pages's Neutral point of view policy. Thanks. – Plarem 09:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
swaminarayn articles
Ok If this post will not remove within week i will file case in court against you.and i will take action against you.than you ask about page that removed by me with my lawyer.