| Revision as of 06:29, 20 August 2013 editCrisco 1492 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators138,136 edits Creating deletion discussion page for User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC. (TW) | Revision as of 06:51, 20 August 2013 edit undoTonyTheTiger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers400,904 edits KNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :{{pagelinks|User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC}} | :{{pagelinks|User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC}} | ||
| Mostly redundant to current RFC at ]; does not follow tips at ] (too stammering, too long, and too biased). — ] (]) 06:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | Mostly redundant to current RFC at ]; does not follow tips at ] (too stammering, too long, and too biased). — ] (]) 06:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - obviously you and your crew think my alternate RFC is biased. It is no more biased than yours, but actually allows for discussion rather than conflated issues.--] <small>(] / ] / ] / ] / ])</small> 06:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:51, 20 August 2013
User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/FOURRFC
Mostly redundant to current RFC at WT:FOUR; does not follow tips at RFC (too stammering, too long, and too biased). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - obviously you and your crew think my alternate RFC is biased. It is no more biased than yours, but actually allows for discussion rather than conflated issues.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)