Misplaced Pages

User talk:RL0919: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:10, 16 August 2013 editSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers300,284 edits Rothbard talk page: Comment← Previous edit Revision as of 06:31, 27 August 2013 edit undoMilesMoney (talk | contribs)3,474 edits Creationism: new sectionNext edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


Now a moot point. More discussion followed, so I decided to be more explicit as to where I came up with the phrases. Thanks again. – ] (]) 02:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Now a moot point. More discussion followed, so I decided to be more explicit as to where I came up with the phrases. Thanks again. – ] (]) 02:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

== Creationism ==

Imagine you were editing ] and ran into a fellow who asked you for a reliable source to back up some detail. You go ahead and give him a college biology textbook, and he tells you that the only truly reliable source in matters of biology is the Bible, which is literally true in all ways.

What do you do then? It's not like you can ever convince him of anything because he's not on the same page as you. You can talk until you're blue in the face, but you'll just get frustrated. He just doesn't understand biology and doesn't want to. Sure, he's got a strong opinion, but it's not worth a damn and there's no reason to listen to it. All you can do is shrug, like Atlas, and move on.

So when you told me you couldn't understand what "popular philosophy" meant in those sources, you were admitting that you don't have what it takes to understand the issues. You might as well have said you only accept the words of Ayn Rand as a reliable source, for all that it matters. And all I can do is shrug and move on. As far as I'm concerned, you're pretty much like that imaginary Bible-thumper: too biased and incompetent to contribute.

Now, I can't stop you from taking this as an insult, but it's really all about your demonstrated behavior and ability, so it's not personal at all. I don't hate you, I just don't think your opinion about Ayn Rand can be trusted, so I can't give it any weight at all. ] (]) 06:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:31, 27 August 2013

Welcome to my talk page!

  • Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
  • If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
    • Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|RL0919}}.
    • I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
    • Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
    • Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Archiving icon
Ye Olde Talk Scrolls

2005-2006 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013




Template:Empty section

{{Empty section}} is up for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 1; I thought you might want to know because you were responsible for closing the DRV on it in 2011. Nyttend (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Verna Hillie

Updated DYK queryOn 13 July 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Verna Hillie, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Verna Hillie. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Allen3  00:04, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night of January 16th, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Bedford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doris Nolan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Woods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Decline Speedy Deletion?

Regarding these two articles: 1. 2.

The reason why I requested Speedy Deletion is because that both of the user's articles aren't in English. They appear to be in Spanish. Spanish Misplaced Pages has their own article on Regular Show here. 76.117.166.209 (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Coherent non-English text is explicitly excluded from the "nonsense" speedy deletion criterion. These pages are user pages, not articles, so they cannot be speedy deleted as duplicates. If the user does nothing with them, I will nominate them for the appropriate deletion process. --RL0919 (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Tu ne cede malis

The Austrian Barnstar of National Merit
Presented to User ‎RL0919

For extraordinary service in the improvement of Murray Rothbard
SPECIFICO talk 23:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Just doing what I can. Thanks. --RL0919 (talk) 03:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Rothbard talk page

I have used two of your phrases in a Talk:Murray Rothbard comment. Please let me know if you'd like me to attribute them to you. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Now a moot point. More discussion followed, so I decided to be more explicit as to where I came up with the phrases. Thanks again. – S. Rich (talk) 02:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Creationism

Imagine you were editing evolution and ran into a fellow who asked you for a reliable source to back up some detail. You go ahead and give him a college biology textbook, and he tells you that the only truly reliable source in matters of biology is the Bible, which is literally true in all ways.

What do you do then? It's not like you can ever convince him of anything because he's not on the same page as you. You can talk until you're blue in the face, but you'll just get frustrated. He just doesn't understand biology and doesn't want to. Sure, he's got a strong opinion, but it's not worth a damn and there's no reason to listen to it. All you can do is shrug, like Atlas, and move on.

So when you told me you couldn't understand what "popular philosophy" meant in those sources, you were admitting that you don't have what it takes to understand the issues. You might as well have said you only accept the words of Ayn Rand as a reliable source, for all that it matters. And all I can do is shrug and move on. As far as I'm concerned, you're pretty much like that imaginary Bible-thumper: too biased and incompetent to contribute.

Now, I can't stop you from taking this as an insult, but it's really all about your demonstrated behavior and ability, so it's not personal at all. I don't hate you, I just don't think your opinion about Ayn Rand can be trusted, so I can't give it any weight at all. MilesMoney (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)