Misplaced Pages

User talk:Canstusdis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:57, 7 September 2013 editCanstusdis (talk | contribs)333 edits →WP:LEAD and good article status: discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein← Previous edit Revision as of 23:54, 9 September 2013 edit undoAwilley (talk | contribs)Administrators14,151 edits →Note about edit warring; BRD: new sectionNext edit →
Line 58: Line 58:
== WP:LEAD and good article status == == WP:LEAD and good article status ==
I'll start a discussion on ]. Thanks. ] I'll start a discussion on ]. Thanks. ]

== Note about edit warring; BRD ==

Hey, I left you a note in the edit summary saying something along the lines of "instead of simply reinstating your edit, why don't you try the talk page to gain consensus." I'm not sure if you saw it or not, so I thought I'd contact you here. I've started a thread on the talk page, where I'd invite you to participate. Also, I see that you've already been warned about ], but I would invite you to have a look at ] which has some really helpful advice on how to deal with situations like this. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~] <small>(])</small></span> 23:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 9 September 2013

Welcome to Misplaced Pages

Welcome!

Hello, Canstusdis, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Patrick Willis

Your edit summary on Patrick Willis called my edit "vandalism". Please remember to assume good faith on Misplaced Pages. I was not intending to vandalize the article. I was trying to avoid weasel words. Calling edits that are not vandalism, vandalism, is not helpful. Kansan (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. Canstusdis (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

RE:Annihilationism

Link MobileSnail 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again. --Canstusdis (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Opposing Texts on Annihilationism

Your continual removal of any annihilationist response to the list of opposing texts on annihilationism is unjustified and unfair. Considering that this is a Misplaced Pages page on annihilationism and that there are traditionalists responses to many of the sections on this page, it is fair and only appropriate that annihilationists have an opportunity to respond to the traditionalist position. Considering that some readers may immediately skip to this section, it is reasonable to have the annihilationist position on these texts briefly mentioned. Sven.ostring (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Friend, this is a wikipedia page, not a justification for your position on annihilationism. Please follow the WP:NPOV and WP:REF guidelines. Thanks. ---Canstusdis (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
for offer of proofreading after Notzrim redirect is sorted out, will take you up on it. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I will be happy to assist. ---Canstusdis (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Necromancy – Dispute Resolution

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Necromancy". Thank you. — Apo-kalypso (talk) 05:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Link to discussion ---Canstusdis (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion

Please take this the way I mean it, purely as a kind suggestion from one Misplaced Pages edit to another, with no malice.

I would suggest you read WP:No vested contributors and WP:own

Your edit summary on Wilford Woodruff reads "Reverted. Again, DO NOT change any of my edits until you have addressed the matter on the talk page. Thanks."

Reading the edit history, it's clear that you made and edit and they "modified it", but you didn't like it and want them to "ask" before change it again.

This goes against those policies. Apo-kalypso and 208.81.184.4 were not required to "Ask" you anything before changing your edit, nor are you required to "ask" them before you edit the page yourself. If you find that someone changed something that you don't like be bold and change it back, and then put your justification on the talk page. Then if they undo it again, it they who are wp:Edit warring, not you.--ARTEST4ECHO (/contribs) 21:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

WP:LEAD and good article status

I'll start a discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein. Thanks. Canstusdis

Note about edit warring; BRD

Hey, I left you a note in the edit summary saying something along the lines of "instead of simply reinstating your edit, why don't you try the talk page to gain consensus." I'm not sure if you saw it or not, so I thought I'd contact you here. I've started a thread on the talk page, where I'd invite you to participate. Also, I see that you've already been warned about WP:3RR, but I would invite you to have a look at WP:BRD which has some really helpful advice on how to deal with situations like this. ~Adjwilley (talk) 23:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)