Revision as of 21:33, 6 September 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 31d) to User talk:Useddenim/Archive 3.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:26, 10 September 2013 edit undo117Avenue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,480 edits →Nomination for deletion of Template:Metro Line: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
''moved to ]'' | ''moved to ]'' | ||
== ] of ] == | |||
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> How many templates need to be nominated for deletion until you understand that you are adding too many lists, diagrams, and navboxes, and editing without discussing your controversial changes? ] (]) 05:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:26, 10 September 2013
|
Archives | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
MBTA color
Hello, Useddenim. You have new messages at Secondarywaltz's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AMT Templates
Hi, I like what you have done with the new templates for the Deux-Montagnes and Mascouche Lines, but they need improvement, because some colors (Saint-Jérôme for example) are default colors. If you are going to change the templates then make sure that they are clear and useful. Thanks! Mtlfiredude (talk) 21:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Should be fixed now. (Pas tout le monde utîlisé dès accents.) Useddenim (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I understand the accent problem. Will you fix the templates for all the other lines (so far only DM and Mascouche Lines have new templates)? I also do not understand some of the history on the templates (Monkland Station on the DM Line??). Mtlfiredude (talk) 03:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- I will update them as I have time, but I'll be going up North through the Simcoe Day weekend. (And see Template:AMT for the explanation of Monkland Station.) Useddenim (talk) 04:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I see. I appreciate your fine template/history work on the AMT lines, very interesting. Just remember to make sure that the AMT logo is present before every line that crosses another one (you did this for Mont-Saint-Hilaire at Central Station but not for Saint-Jérôme). Have a great weekend! Mtlfiredude (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind the AMT logos, just the line color should be enough so you can remove them for the DM Line (I surely would do it for you but don't know how). Thanks again! Mtlfiredude (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Useddenim, I see you upgraded the templates for both Candiac and Saint-Jérôme Lines! That is very nice, and as you can see I thanked you for it. One thing, do not forget to get the real names of the lines (Delson-Candiac on the SJ Line, this is probably due to the fact that the old name is in the system). Also, for the SJ Line (and other future new templates), the colored squares representing the line color must be separated. But other than that, great work!! Mtlfiredude (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Useddenim, will you be updating the templates for MSH and VH lines any soon?
Wow, great work. Try separating the Vaudreuil red and Candiac yellow squares (Saint-Jérôme Line) and the Mascouche pink and Deux-Montagnes blue squares (Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line) and everything will be perfect! Mtlfiredude (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Template
When you know that it is the wrong link, why don't you change it into the correct link? That is not illegal... The Banner talk 16:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- I did make the correction; I don't understand what your comment refers to. (Altho' upon rereading, I guess I could have been a bit clearer with my edit summary…) Useddenim (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Virginia Railway Express colors
Why did you eliminate the colors at Template:VREX color? Did they make some change I didn't know about? -------User:DanTD (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. Sorry—typo on my part when I created the /doc. (If the colors don't show now, click on the link.) Useddenim (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't have to purge. They showed up. -------User:DanTD (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Shanghai Metro line templates
Hi, though this is a little late, but thanks for helping to redraw the templates of the Shanghai Metro lines 1-5. Thought these were quite eye-catching. :-)
Just some comments though - you seem to have, in particular, replaced the use of INT icons with bold / dotted lines as connectors of stations. I'm not too sure if this is particularly relevant though, because there are really few stations that adopt the virtual interchange scheme (so far only South Shaanxi Road Station that I know), and this new scheme of "connection" still looks slightly weird. Do you plan to change the templates for the remaining lines as well? NoNews! 13:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I do. I adopted the —/- - scheme since the old templates used text notation for virtual interchanges, and a mix of (
uINT
) and (HUB82
※uBHF
). The use of (BL
) connectors is well-established for the Hong Kong MTR RDTs—see {{HK-MTR route/West Rail}} for example. I reserved the HUBs for connection with associated mainline stations. Useddenim (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar!
The Template Barnstar | ||
I've just come across Template:Railways in Bridgwater RDT, which is amazingly detailed - I've not seen a better RDT on Misplaced Pages! Having frequently worked on route diagram templates, I realise how much work must've gone into it. Great job! Jr8825 • Talk 15:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
Template:Amtrak
moved to Template talk:Amtrak
Nomination for deletion of Template:Metro Line
Template:Metro Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. How many templates need to be nominated for deletion until you understand that you are adding too many lists, diagrams, and navboxes, and editing without discussing your controversial changes? 117Avenue (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)