| Revision as of 17:57, 19 September 2013 editRebecca1990 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,967 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:07, 19 September 2013 edit undoErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,274 edits !voteNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 15:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Deauxma passes ] because she has been nominated for three "well-known and significant industry awards" by ] and ] and none of them are for "scene-related and ensemble categories". ] (]) 17:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Deauxma passes ] because she has been nominated for three "well-known and significant industry awards" by ] and ] and none of them are for "scene-related and ensemble categories". ] (]) 17:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per nominations. I can find no consensus that "MILF/Cougar Performer of the Year" is not a significant industry award, so even without the other references (which ''are'' reliable), she still passes ]. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:07, 19 September 2013
Deauxma
AfDs for this article:- Deauxma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A pornographic actress whose notability is contested. At Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2013 September 10, a request to recreate this article, originally deleted in 2006 and protected since 2007, turned into a full-fledged sourcing / notability debate but did not result in a consensus. Because content decisions are to be made via AfD, I'm exercising my DRV closer's discretion to refer the article (in the form of the draft proposed for recreation) to AfD for a decision about the sourcing / notability issue. This being a procedural nomination, I myself express no opinion about that issue. Sandstein 12:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails PORNBIO, without multiple nominations for well-known/significant awards. Fails the GNG, because there are no reliable sources for biographical content -- all the references, beyond databases and laundry lists, are either promotional pages or press releases. Fails BLP requirements, as an article concerning a living person without reliable sources. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 12:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Deauxma passes WP:PORNBIO because she has been nominated for three "well-known and significant industry awards" by AVN and XBIZ and none of them are for "scene-related and ensemble categories". Rebecca1990 (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per nominations. I can find no consensus that "MILF/Cougar Performer of the Year" is not a significant industry award, so even without the other references (which are reliable), she still passes WP:PORNBIO. Erpert 18:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)