Misplaced Pages

Talk:Slavery in the Ottoman Empire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:51, 4 March 2012 editSecondat of Orange (talk | contribs)216 edits Bare Assertions and Lies← Previous edit Revision as of 16:32, 2 October 2013 edit undoParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,155 edits Removal of referenced information: new sectionNext edit →
Line 48: Line 48:
::'''' ISBN 9780521840668 pages 28-44 is a source that can be used to improve this. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 16:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC) ::'''' ISBN 9780521840668 pages 28-44 is a source that can be used to improve this. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']'''</small> 16:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
::: That book was amazing, thank you. -- ] (]) 17:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC) ::: That book was amazing, thank you. -- ] (]) 17:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

== Removal of referenced information ==

User:Yozer has seen fit to remove referenced information under the guise of "Removed non-relevant content". I reverted asking, "explain how a group of individuals sold as slaves are irrelevant in an article titled "Slavery in the Ottoman Empire", instead of an answer Yozer quickly tries to make it personal stating, "Thanks for your bias Kansas Bear". I see nothing productive in Yozer's statement nor an explanation for the removal of references and referenced information. Such information will be restored. Continued remarks aimed at an <u>editor</u> and not <u>content</u> will be reported. --] (]) 16:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:32, 2 October 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slavery in the Ottoman Empire article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconFormer countries (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!


The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Upload

Comments

ottoman slavetrade?

i must've been absent those days in school because i never heard of an ottoman slavetrade,aka muslim slavetrade,or is slavery only wrong when people who look like me do it?i'm constantly having to feel apologetic for the atlantic slavetrade with sub-saharan africa but the hundreds of years of ottoman enslavement of probably millions of non-muslims or non-ottomans and of course half of their own population,women,gets a complete pass.because as always slavery,bigotry and atrocities are only wrong when it's convenient for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.29.190.51 (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

The article is a bit misleading and exaggerated.

Slavery was common in the Ottoman empire, but a few things are not very clear in the article.

1 The Kapikulu were in reality captured prisoners of war or christian children who were enrolled in as Janissaries, but these were not ordinary slaves who worked in households, in the farms or industry, no they were military slaves. In fact they were not really slaves, but they were considered to be the servants and soldiers of the Sultan. They lived in barracks got monthly paid and could rise to important ranks. They were elite soldiers, and the normal population saw them ofcourse not as slaves, but in the end they always had to obey the Sultan, which was officially their masters, but in reality these Jannisaries also many times revolted against their master the Sultan. For increase of their payments, or they also intervened in the Ottoman politics. They became a state in the state and made many revolts against the Sultans who tried to reform them, they were also so powerfull they actually killed Sultan Osman II, Selim III and were finally destroyed by Sultan Mahmud II after they had tried to kill him too.

2 And about the numbers of Janissaries, they numbered between the 14th-15th centuries some 6.000 and most of them lived probably at least an average 20 years, they were elite soldiers, and had to complete years of training and they were never mend to be used as cannon fodder. So actually there were not non stop christian children taken from their parents to become jannisary, no in reality it was very insignificant when it is remembered that the Ottomans ruled over at least 5 million christians in the same time.

3 Between the 15th-16th centuries the average number of janissaries was 12.000 an increase because the empire expanded, but when taken into consideration of the average life time of a janissary and the 6-7 million christian population this is not a big number.

And not all of these Janissaries were actually children taken by the devshirme it included prisoners of war, and there many wars in those ages.

4 The jannisaries got many new priviliges in the end of the 16th century such as they were allowed to marry and their children had the right to become janissary, before this it was all forbidden. Finally when the Ottomans needed more soldiers in the end of the 16th centuries they allowed free born muslims and christians to enter the janissary corps, because they had a lack of manpower, after 1600 the taking of boys from christian families had practically stopped. Most of the Jannisarries then were actually sons of Janisarries and new recruits of freeborn muslim and christians.

So when there are 40,000 Janissaries in 1650, 90% of them are sons of Janissaries or new members, not persons taken as children. And in later centuries almost all of them.

5 The total number of Janissaries by Devshirme I estimate between 1370- and 1620 = 250 years. (Average life after being taken to become a Janissary I estimate as 20 years)

                                                                                   (average recruits in 1 year)
Between 1370-1430 = 60 years, average 3,000 Janissary, 60/20 = 3    3 x 3,000   = 9,000         (150)
Between 1430-1480 = 50 years, average 8,000 Janissary, 50/20 = 2,5  2,5 x 8,000 = 20,000        (300)
Between 1480-1520 = 40 years, average 12,000 Janissary, 40/20 = 2   2 x 12,000  = 24,000        (500)
Between 1520-1580 = 60 years, average 18,000 Janissary, 60/20 = 3   3 x 18,000  = 54,000        (750)
Between 1580-1620* = 40 years, average 12,000 Janissary, 40/20 = 2   2 x 12,000 = 24,000        (500)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total number of Janissaries between 1370-1620 (250 years)                      131,000          (524)
*excluding Janissaries from non Devshirme origin.

DragonTiger23 (talk) 11:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Bare Assertions and Lies

A member of the Ottoman slave class, called a kul in Turkish, could achieve high status. Harem guards and janissaries are some of the better known positions a slave could hold, but slaves were actually at the forefront of Ottoman politics. The majority of officials in the Ottoman government were bought slaves, raised free, and integral to the success of the Ottomans from the fourteenth century to the nineteenth. By raising and specially training slaves as officials, they created administrators with intricate knowledge of government and fanatic loyalty, and cut corruption. As an administrator with no ties in the region, he would not favor one person over another when granting contracts.

There is no evidence of this at all; sounds like Ottoman fabrications. Anyone in the mood to delete this? -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

One more month and I'm going to remove this. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The Cambridge World History of Slavery: The ancient Mediterranean world ISBN 9780521840668 pages 28-44 is a source that can be used to improve this. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
That book was amazing, thank you. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Removal of referenced information

User:Yozer has seen fit to remove referenced information under the guise of "Removed non-relevant content". I reverted asking, "explain how a group of individuals sold as slaves are irrelevant in an article titled "Slavery in the Ottoman Empire", instead of an answer Yozer quickly tries to make it personal stating, "Thanks for your bias Kansas Bear". I see nothing productive in Yozer's statement nor an explanation for the removal of references and referenced information. Such information will be restored. Continued remarks aimed at an editor and not content will be reported. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Category: