Misplaced Pages

User talk:GiantSnowman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:16, 4 October 2013 editGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators600,983 editsm dup section← Previous edit Revision as of 10:21, 4 October 2013 edit undoGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators600,983 edits archivingNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Archive box|box-width=50px|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} {{Archive box|box-width=50px|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}}
{{TOCright}} {{TOCright}}

== 2013–14 Everton F.C. season ==

Hello GS, could you please add ] to your watchlist. I have removed Assists from the article but I have a feeling that it's going to be reverted immediately. I have let Spc 21 know, who incidentally thinks ... ] (]) 00:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

== 2013-2014 Liverpool F.C. season ==

Hello GS again! ] has been created by copy and pasting from the actual ] article because of the content dispute block in effect. I am not sure if you Speedy Delete or AfD the copied article? Thanks, ] (]) 04:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

But would you consider giving the others' right to edit 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season so that we can update the info more frequently?

Thanks, ] (]) 09:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

== JMHamo ==

As far as I know, my latest block ends tomorrow. I am not making any edits this evening, as I would usually do, as I am actually genuinely trying not to stir the pot. What I would like to know is, when the block ends tomorrow and I am allowed to edit again, will JMHamo still be allowed to revert every single edit I make? I see he is continuing to revert my edits but I have chosen not to do anything about it this time. I am putting my faith in the fact that this is happening because I am "evading blocks" and when my block ends tomorrow, he will stop doing it.

A couple of points..

1/ You agreed that there was nothing wrong with my edits.
2/ Why does JMHamo not get reprimanded for reverting all of my edits and edit warring with me?

As I said, I am not making any more edits until my block ends. I would just like a bit more co-operation from people. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hello <insert IP here> I have no issues with your edits, but if you don't follow the and keep demonstrating ] with insults, then we will clash. ] (]) 23:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Deleted page ==

Hi Giant Snowman

A friend has just informed me that my Misplaced Pages page for my ebook has been deleted? Not sure why as the page seemed to include links to newspaper articles on the book? I was told I couldn't get a page yet, but my book could, so not sure why it's been deleted? This was a big achievement for me, to find out I was on Misplaced Pages and I'm really frustrated at this.

Louise <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Hi not sure if you saw my reply on the other page, but it has definitely been deleted by you : http://en.wikipedia.org/The_Shadows_%28e-book%29 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== O Haver ==
A Mujsh Me Ma Hanger Karin O Haver :v

] (])

== Arsenal squad template ==

Hi there. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I'm ]. I noticed that you recently undid my edits to the ] page, and changed the update source to the Premier League website. There are a few problems with your edits. First of all, could you provide a valid link to a Misplaced Pages project page where the exact definition of 'current squad' is clearly stated to support your argument? Also, the Premier League website does not seem to be a valid update source for the 'current squad' as it only provides players' stats in the Premier League and it does not fully support the inclusion of ] and ], who you added to the squad template supposedly because they featured in Arsenal's League Cup game against West Brom this season. If that is the case, why didn't you also add ] and Kristoffer Olsson who both featured in the same game as well. Please explain your edit briefly and make any changes as appropriate. Thanks. --] (]) 22:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

== What the hell ==

Why are you undoing my proposals for deletion. They are fresh proposals, not me just reverting your deleting of my original one. I re registered them at a new time point because the original was deleted by you. These articles need to be deleted, what the hell is your problem? ] (]) 08:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== ivsEdits page ==

Hello GS, on last June you have deleted the page related to ivsEdits because in your opinion it was missing notability criteria: 08:39, 7 June 2013 GiantSnowman (talk | contribs) deleted page IvsEdits (Expired PROD, concern was: No evidence that this product meets the notability criteria.)
I'd like to ask you to see if now after ] that is a notability company is using video edited with ivsEdits to promote their products it is enough to restore the page:
see Paolo Castellano video review . ] (]) 11:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I didn't delete it because ''I'' didn't think it was not notable, I deleted it because another user ] and there was no objection after 7 days. If you want I can restore the article. ]] 10:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello GS, what is the right method to use talk?
My apologies, I dont know what is the way to reply to your message.
yes I'd like you can restore the article and please confirm to me if the link I have sent to you can be elected as a notability source.
] (]) 13:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

:You can respond at your talk page or at my page (just let me know where you'll be posting!), no need to open a 'new section' every time, simply click 'Edit' on the existing section and post at the bottom. I will restore the article, but a review is not a reliable source. Please see ] and ] for more information. ]] 11:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the explanation. About a review I can understand it if it is a single review, but I not understand why a NLE program as ivsEdits available since 2008 that has been downloaded from many notable file sharing sites (CNET,SOFTPEDIA,FILEFISHSTICK,HWUPGRADEFiles,HTML.IT,etc) more than 100,000. times cant found a place in the list of Free video Editing software when a software like ] "without enough sources" can be listed there from 2010. I'm telling it because someone has deleted ivsEdits also today. ivsEdits is a professional software , there are hundred of youtube video around the world that are describing it and show the success got from users, I have added several references but all has been always deleted. There are several indipendent reviews on the web, they appears similar to other reviews have been accepted to give notability to sony Vegas. I'd like not discover that wikipedia is like Italian magazines that they report news about a product only if it pay for advertising: They say if one not pays advertising it not exists. My brother wrote the same page for ivsEdits and Harris Broadcast Velocity, we are amazed because the second one is still listed with only 3 references ... this could push someone to think that some wiki editor prefers tolerate US products against Italian sw products. If wikipedia is free and Indipendent as claims , I'm sure that it is also your interest to help me to investigate on these matters. Misplaced Pages can be also free but I not see equity. About deletion, It is strange to read you never got opposition, I believe your words because I see a big courtesy to manage my questions but at that time I talked with someothers to avoid deletion. I have some text on my talkpage .can you read it?
this is a review from a notable US Magazine:
http://www.hdvideopro.com/workflow/desktop-nle-systems/the-cutting-edge.html?start=3

] (]) 13:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Categories - Reply ==

Hi there GS,

just me being picky (and oversensitive in the process!), yes i know there is no real order, and fresh cats are put in the bottom of the list, but i try to have everything organized, as follows: PERSONAL stuff: birth, descent, etc; FOOTBALL stuff: nationality, position, leagues then clubs where they played in country, then same abroad. Still in FOOTBALL stuff, international bits, and we end it with the expatriate categories, if needed (these may not be the last items, if the player turns into a manager).

As you very well put it, no harm with the categories "scrambled", but no harm with what i'm doing either is there? Cheerio. --] (]) 14:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== John Logie Baird ==
> Please can you explain why you have re-introduced a sizeable amount of entirely unreferenced information into this biography? GiantSnowman 14:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The way to improve a Wiki article that contains plausible and potentially useful but unsourced information is not to delete it, but rather to tag it as unsourced, as you just did, or to add a citation for a reliable source. Your "cn" tags look good. ] (]) 14:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== adding categories ==

thanks for the advice. will use in future, but in this instance (i'm looking at a line-up card from a 1980 NASL indoor match, Kicks vs Surf), i tend to see what else may have been left off as i go from player to player. cheers. -] (]) 18:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Sorry, admin ==

Hi, there. If you feel offended by that fact that I had not heard of you before, I hereby offer my sincere apology. I did read the consensus at ] and that is why I brought this up as your edits have conflicts with the consensus. Sadly, as you, an admin, 'ignored' most part of my previous post because you thought I was 'trolling', I will now reiterate what I said.

"The Premier League website does not seem to be a valid update source for the 'current squad' as it only provides players' stats in the Premier League and it does not fully support the inclusion of ] and ], who you added to the squad template supposedly because they featured in Arsenal's League Cup game against West Brom this season. If that is the case, why didn't you also add ] and Kristoffer Olsson who both featured in the same game as well."

And this is what you posted on ]: " includes players with a squad number and/or who have played first-team football with the club and are still contracted."

Hopefully, it won't be ignored again this time. Please make any changes as appropriate.--] (]) 20:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

: I am sorry I forgot that we interacted before. Anyways, you did not just undo my edit that removed the 2/3 reserve players, but also changed the update source to the Premier League website, which I would not consider valid. As I stated before, the new source you added does not fully support the inclusion of ] and ] who have not featured in the Premier League in the 'current' season. --] (]) 20:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

:: Yes, thanks for finally realizing that you made a mistake undoing one of my edits. Please go ahead and correct it. --] (]) 20:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

==Buckethead==

GiantSnowman you keep deleting the info on Buckethead's "Early Life" category
sending me a message that its "not verified?"
What isnt verified? The fact that he took lessons from all the people
mentioned? I happen to be one of them and I find it in bad taste
to delete also the name of the late Johnny Fortune, who was also
one of his teachers. Please advise! Thank you.

Pebber Brown <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Ravel Morrison ==

Are you quite sure Mr Morrison's career stats are unreferenced? ] (]) 17:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


== Gloria Richardson == == Gloria Richardson ==

Revision as of 10:21, 4 October 2013

Archiving icon
Archives

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013


Gloria Richardson

What are you doing with the Gloria Richardson page? What are your specific problems with it?--GPRamirez5 (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

In what manner was it non-neutral? Most of this material isn't mine, by the way - it just seems like those previous contributions shouldn't be swept away without a hearing; As far as I can tell, it's all accurate.--GPRamirez5 (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I understand. On further inspection, it appears that this editor may in fact have a conflict of interest, as he is working on a book about Richardson.--GPRamirez5 (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Jesé Rodríguez and his most renowned defender

GS, please weigh in on this message I have sent the user referred to in the title of my "letter" to you (see here https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:SideMaster#Jes.C3.A9_Rodr.C3.ADguez_-_Again), getting a bit annoying...

Kind regards, happy weekend --AL (talk) 00:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Citation policy on living persons

Regarding the Early Life section on Buckethead's page once again, there exists a known recording of Buckethead playing at the 25th anniversary of Styles Music (where he took lessons in his younger years) which was a public concert and he paid tribute to all his early teachers there BY NAME one after another. Does this qualify as a reliabel source? Also this Early Life section has been posted in its previous (not deleted by you) form for several years now with no commplaints about the reliability of its content. Why now - at this time are you deleting the previous, well known data? Lastly, Buckethead mentions his teachers BY NAME on his Young Buckethead DVD which is widely available. Does this also constitute a reliable source? Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.254.213 (talk) 01:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Message regarding undocumented info.

You are wrong. The early life section for my friend Brian Carroll is well documented. It is in video form, album liner notes and his own documented words. Stop deleting documented information or you will be reported to Wiki. Who is paying you to do this? What makes you the one to decide it shouldn't be there when you've done no research to back it up? I was there, during this historic time. Where were you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.48.224 (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)