Revision as of 17:15, 2 November 2013 editArzel (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers12,013 edits →Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:21, 5 November 2013 edit undoDrFleischman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,325 edits →Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_ActNext edit → |
Line 68: |
Line 68: |
|
|
|
|
|
You are at ] on the ] article. I suggest you read up on ] and ] and ]. The lede is inappropriate for the opinions of specific players. We could load up the lead with all kinds of opinion. This particular bit you like seems to be a ] view of the effect of the ACA on small businesses. I suggest you get consensus for your edit on the talk page before adding this material again. Furthermore, editing past 3RR may result in a short block of your account. ] (]) 17:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
You are at ] on the ] article. I suggest you read up on ] and ] and ]. The lede is inappropriate for the opinions of specific players. We could load up the lead with all kinds of opinion. This particular bit you like seems to be a ] view of the effect of the ACA on small businesses. I suggest you get consensus for your edit on the talk page before adding this material again. Furthermore, editing past 3RR may result in a short block of your account. ] (]) 17:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there. I was reviewing the recent edit history over at ] and related pages and I'm having a difficult time ] regarding some of your recent conduct. It appears that within a 3 hour period you did the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
# You with some of my edits at ]. (Nothing wrong with that, though your edit comment was rather ].) |
|
|
# You twice reverted (, ) language that was the subject of an edit war just the day before. |
|
|
# You then on ] about that very edit war, in a way that appears intended to disparage me. |
|
|
# You then the same edit ''yet again'', even though you knew there was an ongoing edit war dispute about it. |
|
|
# Four minutes later, while your preferred version of the article was currently in place, you full protection, with the comment, "Edit war needs to cool, for a while." |
|
|
# (The next day, after your edit was reverted back, full protection was put in place, and discussion about the contested material was ongoing, you administrator assistance to re-revert ''yet again''.) |
|
|
|
|
|
If you could, please explain your motivation for these edits and why I shouldn't report you to ] or ] for extremely ]. --] (]) 00:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC) |