Misplaced Pages

User talk:74.196.111.68: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:54, 9 November 2013 editJim1138 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,704 edits fix← Previous edit Revision as of 10:59, 9 November 2013 edit undo74.196.111.68 (talk) November 2013Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.

No, there isn't. And that wasn't a threat. I personally, will subpoena you and the person responsible for approve you random edits.

Coercion, brings in racketeering, if any profit is made from your personal guarding of the page in question.

Revision as of 10:59, 9 November 2013

November 2013

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Nancy Grace, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Something of that nature will need to be cited with reliable sources. See WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE. If there is other accusations of that nature, they too should be removed. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Refer me, or cite herein, the section of Misplaced Pages's policies that state that such must be cited. Obstruction is also serious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User talk:74.196.111.68 (talkcontribs)

Click on WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE. Do not replace that content without citing a source. Doing so may result in a wp:block Jim1138 (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

If you block me for stating such; you will be subpoenaed for obstruction.

Misplaced Pages's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources.

My entry was not a quotation. Challenged or likely to be challenged, by whom? There is no specificity. The material is verifiable. Public Information requests are how the information is obtained, and may not be shared.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Legal threat by User talk:74.196.111.68. Thank you.

No, there isn't. And that wasn't a threat. I personally, will subpoena you and the person responsible for approve you random edits.

Coercion, brings in racketeering, if any profit is made from your personal guarding of the page in question.