| Revision as of 17:19, 12 October 2013 editLeonardo Piccioni de Almeida (talk | contribs)7 edits →High level of controversy← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:53, 30 November 2013 edit undoRauzaruku (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users4,971 edits →High level of controversy: -Corinthians fans opinions aren't relevant.Next edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ==High level of controversy== | ==High level of controversy== | ||
| This article Arena Corinthians has a high level of controversy. Corinthians Team is unpopular in Brazil as a team that is notably and demonstrably buying titles (they robbed ], ], and all, most brazen theft was the ], and tried to rob others too) and have connects with the Brazilian media mafia. This stadium was funded hastily and in a highly suspect and controversial, generating a huge national controversy in Brazil. The World Cup Stadium in São Paulo should be the Morumbi, but purposely the government made impossible requests to fulfill, to have an excuse to remove the Morumbi from Cup, and enjoy the chance to build a stadium and simply surrender it to Corinhtians. Clearly been held in Brazil, an attempt to do a forced aggrandizement to Corinthians, with the help of the government itself (former President Lula even was a supporter of Corinthians, and the idea is that the Corinhtians, being a "mass team", may serve to "controlling" the Brazilian people or tame him before major problems of the country). The article does not say anything about it. I think even unfortunate highlight this article as GA, it's like trying to highlight an article about a thief or a murderer. Brazil has 200 million inhabitants, 30 million are fans of Corinthians and 170 hate this team and all that it represents. I'm warning you this article will never be stable, because of the level of controversy in which he engages. ] (]) 05:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | This article Arena Corinthians has a high level of controversy. Corinthians Team is unpopular in Brazil as a team that is notably and demonstrably buying titles (they robbed ], ], and all, most brazen theft was the ], and tried to rob others too) and have connects with the Brazilian media mafia. This stadium was funded hastily and in a highly suspect and controversial, generating a huge national controversy in Brazil. The World Cup Stadium in São Paulo should be the Morumbi, but purposely the government made impossible requests to fulfill, to have an excuse to remove the Morumbi from Cup, and enjoy the chance to build a stadium and simply surrender it to Corinhtians. Clearly been held in Brazil, an attempt to do a forced aggrandizement to Corinthians, with the help of the government itself (former President Lula even was a supporter of Corinthians, and the idea is that the Corinhtians, being a "mass team", may serve to "controlling" the Brazilian people or tame him before major problems of the country). The article does not say anything about it. I think even unfortunate highlight this article as GA, it's like trying to highlight an article about a thief or a murderer. Brazil has 200 million inhabitants, 30 million are fans of Corinthians and 170 hate this team and all that it represents. I'm warning you this article will never be stable, because of the level of controversy in which he engages. ] (]) 05:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *It's unnecessary to say how much it's subjective. According to independent group , Corinthians was the 5th team more prejudiced in the 2012 national championship and, therefore, lost its space in Libertadores da América by arbitration errors. This year, Corinthians wasn't favoured once, according to same. Same way, one could argue that there are no proofs that Corinthians "bought" any championship, that the supposed "errors" were purposed, and the championships you cited are only a fraction of the trophies the team managed to win last years. I don't know any research that confirms that 170 million Brazilians hate Corinthians, I'd like that you provided the scientific experiments that shows it. The "impossible requests" that FIFA asked for Morumbi were, as far as I remember, parking slots (that's a fair request, if you ever gone to Morumbi stadium), and the stadium was disqualified for don't presenting '''any''' sufficient project until the deadline. Moreover, I don't know why Misplaced Pages couldn't highlight an article about a criminal, if the content is sufficiently encyclopedic. The stadium will be paid with borrowed money (Corinthians presented guarantees that he'll pay) and tax incentive (granted to all enterprises on the east side of the city). I accept our warning, but your accusations are unsourced. ] 17:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talk:Arena Corinthians/GA1}} | {{Talk:Arena Corinthians/GA1}} | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 30 November 2013
 | Arena Corinthians has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 26, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Arena Corinthians appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
File:NewCorinthiansStadium.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
|
An image used in this article, File:NewCorinthiansStadium.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Misplaced Pages files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Stadium name
FIFA give the name Arena de São Paulo to the stadium. You can see in the 2014 FIFA World Cup page and in the Portuguese and Spanish pages. I moved the page to the new name. --Carioca (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
High level of controversy
This article Arena Corinthians has a high level of controversy. Corinthians Team is unpopular in Brazil as a team that is notably and demonstrably buying titles (they robbed 2002 Copa do Brasil, 2009 Copa do Brasil, and all, most brazen theft was the 2005 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A, and tried to rob others too) and have connects with the Brazilian media mafia. This stadium was funded hastily and in a highly suspect and controversial, generating a huge national controversy in Brazil. The World Cup Stadium in São Paulo should be the Morumbi, but purposely the government made impossible requests to fulfill, to have an excuse to remove the Morumbi from Cup, and enjoy the chance to build a stadium and simply surrender it to Corinhtians. Clearly been held in Brazil, an attempt to do a forced aggrandizement to Corinthians, with the help of the government itself (former President Lula even was a supporter of Corinthians, and the idea is that the Corinhtians, being a "mass team", may serve to "controlling" the Brazilian people or tame him before major problems of the country). The article does not say anything about it. I think even unfortunate highlight this article as GA, it's like trying to highlight an article about a thief or a murderer. Brazil has 200 million inhabitants, 30 million are fans of Corinthians and 170 hate this team and all that it represents. I'm warning you this article will never be stable, because of the level of controversy in which he engages. Rauzaruku (talk) 05:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Arena Corinthians/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 15:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Hi, I will be doing the review for this article.Nothing much to say but there are some drawbacks
- Please provide reference for "The stadium will have wi-fi in all its sectors. Using smartphones, the public will be able to access game stats and watch replays published on a page maintained by the stadium crew."Otherwise it is looking like original research
- Some grammatical errors like " The west and east sides there are joined" which should be The west and east sides are joined...
Hope you improve.RRD13 (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi RDD13, thanks for dedicating your time to review this article. The phrase you mentioned was referenced on *114*, right below it. I moved the reference up and duplicated the reference on the following phrase. I also changed the wrong phrase as remarked. Thanks!Legionarius (talk) 23:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- User:Royroydeb you may want to review these recent talk and DRN threads when determining the articles stability. talk page and -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- I believed that due to the outcome of this incident the article should be stable again.Legionarius (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- User:Royroydeb you may want to review these recent talk and DRN threads when determining the articles stability. talk page and -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)