| Revision as of 17:27, 4 December 2013 editRauzaruku (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users4,971 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:22, 4 December 2013 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,417 edits →Blocked: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ==Arena Corinthians== | ==Arena Corinthians== | ||
| I've added more sources. If you want a consensus, Write a section with the official version, so I can adapt my text to yours. The article will only be complete, and deserve the status of GA, if both versions are written in the article, both are relevant, documented and known by brazilian people. GA articles are huge and does not omit any material or information. The option I have, if you don't do something like that, is asking for retire GA status, by the notorious lack of information and instability. The instability that you and Legionarius are causing in the article is reason for an article miss the GA too. If you keep ignoring it, that is my offer of consensus, is because you are declaring a partial editor, and will justify your block. I admit grammar correction and adaptations in my text, not a full retire. ] (]) 17:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | I've added more sources. If you want a consensus, Write a section with the official version, so I can adapt my text to yours. The article will only be complete, and deserve the status of GA, if both versions are written in the article, both are relevant, documented and known by brazilian people. GA articles are huge and does not omit any material or information. The option I have, if you don't do something like that, is asking for retire GA status, by the notorious lack of information and instability. The instability that you and Legionarius are causing in the article is reason for an article miss the GA too. If you keep ignoring it, that is my offer of consensus, is because you are declaring a partial editor, and will justify your block. I admit grammar correction and adaptations in my text, not a full retire. ] (]) 17:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] Anonymous users from this IP address have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 hours''' for ], as done at ]. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may ] and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 23:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ablock --> | |||
Revision as of 23:22, 4 December 2013
December 2013
Your recent editing history at Arena Corinthians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ben 17:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hey, Corinthians supporter
I suggest you stop cheering for the team of Corinthians and with it, turn an honest person, finally. Rauzaruku (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (130.88.164.18) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Ben 23:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Do you have any mental problem?
You can't remove my sources and do anything you want with my text. Rauzaruku (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Blogs are not realiable sources. This is not your Corinthians blog. Rauzaruku (talk) 01:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Your edits to Arena Corinthians
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Arena Corinthians with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Rauzaruku (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Arena Corinthians". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 03:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Arena Corinthians
I've added more sources. If you want a consensus, Write a section with the official version, so I can adapt my text to yours. The article will only be complete, and deserve the status of GA, if both versions are written in the article, both are relevant, documented and known by brazilian people. GA articles are huge and does not omit any material or information. The option I have, if you don't do something like that, is asking for retire GA status, by the notorious lack of information and instability. The instability that you and Legionarius are causing in the article is reason for an article miss the GA too. If you keep ignoring it, that is my offer of consensus, is because you are declaring a partial editor, and will justify your block. I admit grammar correction and adaptations in my text, not a full retire. Rauzaruku (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)