Revision as of 01:56, 12 December 2013 editCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,417 edits →Reviewer userright granted: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:26, 12 December 2013 edit undoONITOPIA (talk | contribs)42 edits →Warning to User Sni56996: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
*], the summary of the use of pending changes | *], the summary of the use of pending changes | ||
*], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 01:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | *], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 01:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Warning to User Sni56996 == | |||
I have to give you several warnings! Deleting them will not work since all changes are saved and visble! If you ignore the warnings a last warning will happen and then a report to an admin! | |||
Warnung 1: | |||
] Please stop your ], as you did at ]. Your edits have been ] or removed. | |||
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ]. | |||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> | |||
''No attempts to communicate or discuss a matter!'' | |||
Warnung 2: | |||
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> | |||
''Knowingly posting false information is vadalism!'' | |||
Warning 3: | |||
] Please stop. Misplaced Pages is ]. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to ], will be regarded as ]. If you continue in this manner, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-notcensored3 --> | |||
] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> | |||
] Please stop assuming ] as you did at ]. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to ] and ], and is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-own3 --> | |||
''Making only your own opinion count is not neutral and censors others! You behave as if you own the article! | |||
Thereby you ignore and delete reliable sources, plus you insist on deliberate misspelling!'' | |||
Addionally: | |||
You delete discussion attempts without reacting to them in Talk section! | |||
You violate the three-revert rule! | |||
'''You are officially notified!''' --] (]) 02:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:26, 12 December 2013
Archives |
|
About Girls' Generation discography, Flower Power (song) and Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album)
Please, please, please, stop your disruptive editing. I've already explained numerous times that "6TheoryMedia" needs to be included because it is the publisher. The work/website parameter in the cite web template is used for the name of the website. Also, why is it so hard to engage in a discussion? I've attempted numerous times to start one but you just ignore and revert anyway. The only time it is not included is when the source in question is a periodical but that is not the case here, so... Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 04:41, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'm getting tired of this. Unless you're willing to engage in a discussion, this is futile. I've already stated my point, pointing out to you why for umpteenth time "6TheoryMedia" is included as the publisher. Also, don't be a hypocrite posting a "not assuming good faith" template to my talk page and then simply reverting again. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 07:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Fine, lets discuss. If a source is directly from allkpop, then why 6Theroy Media need to be included?
Launched in October 2007, allkpop.com (parent company 6Theory) has become the premier source for all the latest K-pop celebrity gossip and news. Catering to over 6 million monthly readers worldwide*, and serving over 100 million page views per month*, allkpop is the most trafficked English based K-pop news site in the world. allkpop works around the clock to be the first to deliver minute to minute breaking news, gossip, and the most exclusive coverage on the hottest K-pop stars. (Source)
- Root word of "publisher" is publish.
pub·lish (pblsh)
v. pub·lished, pub·lish·ing, pub·lish·es
v.tr.
1. To prepare and issue (printed material) for public distribution or sale. (Source)
and the meaning of publisher,
pub·lish·er (pbl-shr)
n.
One that is engaged in publishing printed material. (Source)
- So as a whole, "publisher=" is for allkpop because it is a publisher of K-pop news and "work=" is meant for 6Theory Media because it's not a news site.
- Practicing the usage of either one of the parameter is enough to indicate where the source is coming from; so why need to include something unnecessary?
- Sni56996 (talk) 08:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's not unnecessary. "Publisher=" is for 6TheoryMedia. Because 6TheoryMedia publishes Allkpop. See almost any ref from Billboard, where Prometheus Global Media is also listed because Prometheus Global Media owns, and therefore publishes Billboard. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 08:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- I still not convinced. Like I said before, its the meaning of the word, not substantial purpose of the parameter as a whole. Sni56996 (talk) 18:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Regardless of the meaning of the word "publish", "6TheoryMedia" should be included in any ref from Allkpop anyways. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Take a look at these guides to citing webpages: Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 07:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- But an editor should follow Misplaced Pages guides/styles, not from other websites. Sni56996 (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I just provided those websites as further examples, Misplaced Pages uses the same citation styles. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 07:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- But an editor should follow Misplaced Pages guides/styles, not from other websites. Sni56996 (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I still not convinced. Like I said before, its the meaning of the word, not substantial purpose of the parameter as a whole. Sni56996 (talk) 18:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- template:Cite web/doc has examples where work = Encyclopedia of Things and publisher = Open Publishing website also is the same as work, and for template:Cite news/doc, work is the same as journal, newspaper, magazine, periodical. At the bottom of the www.allkpop.com page is: "Copyright © 2007-2013 6Theory Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. allkpop® is part of the 6Theory Media, LLC, Network. | Handcrafted by Kami". So Allkpop can be used as work / website and publisher can be 6Theory Media. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
No space after publisher
Hi, I was checking the history for the 2NE1 article. Can you point to the Misplaced Pages standards that require that no space be between publisher and the = sign ? I don't think it really matters in the cite web as the data is processed the same way. The cite web itself also shows varied spacing in the vertical format. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I am using a user script called, "ProveIt located at Gadgets under Preferences. It doesn't require any spacing between the equal sign. Sni56996 (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, cool. Looks like the script automatically handles it then. No worries. :) -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Removal of lyrics
Can I ask why you have removed the first two lines of the song here. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Okay, message on Talk page received. Are you simply saying you want this format:
Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore—
While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.
"'Tis some visiter," I muttered, "tapping at my chamber door—
Only this and nothing more."
In ictu oculi (talk) 11:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Forget about the format. The matter is already settled! Sni56996 (talk) 11:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Goodo. Thank you for restoring. FWIW WP:SONGLYRICS allows/encourages small quotes from song lyrics. In this case the first 2 lines are needed to demonstrate the unusual mix of Japanese and English mentioned in the article. As for WP:MOS the relevant section MOS:Blockquote can be varied when (1) text, (2) romanization and (3) translation and required. The specimen text "Once upon a midnight dreary" is by Edgar Allen Poe so out of copyright, most song lyrics are in copyright, therefore come under fair use and maximum 10-20% of the song only can be quoted. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Bedok Mall) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bedok Mall, Sni56996!
Misplaced Pages editor Jprg1966 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
The article's subject is notable, but could use external verification. I added some links to the page at the bottom to assist with that. Thanks.
To reply, leave a comment on Jprg1966's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
- Message noted. Sni56996 (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
About ref
"interest.me" should be included not only because it's part of the url but also because "Mwave" is also an online computer store, antenna store, something else, emergency coms, Chinese tech store. There is also an arena in Japan called M-Wave and something else at IBM Mwave. If only there was a wiki page on this specific website, then it could be wikilinked to Mwave and nothing else. Cheers. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:55, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for the explanation. Sni56996 (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi Sni56996, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 09:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Reviewer userright granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Misplaced Pages:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Warning to User Sni56996
I have to give you several warnings! Deleting them will not work since all changes are saved and visble! If you ignore the warnings a last warning will happen and then a report to an admin!
Warnung 1: Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album). Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. No attempts to communicate or discuss a matter!
Warnung 2: Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album), you may be blocked from editing. Knowingly posting false information is vadalism!
Warning 3: Please stop. Misplaced Pages is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album), will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Love & Peace (Girls' Generation album). Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Making only your own opinion count is not neutral and censors others! You behave as if you own the article! Thereby you ignore and delete reliable sources, plus you insist on deliberate misspelling!
Addionally: You delete discussion attempts without reacting to them in Talk section! You violate the three-revert rule!
You are officially notified! --ONITOPIA (talk) 02:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)