| Revision as of 18:55, 5 January 2014 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,678 edits create Workshop page | Revision as of 03:07, 6 January 2014 edit undoRobert McClenon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers197,208 edits →Proposals by User:Robert McClenonNext edit → | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| =Proposed final decision= | =Proposed final decision= | ||
| ==Proposals by User: |
==Proposals by ]== | ||
| ===Proposed principles=== | ===Proposed principles=== | ||
| === |
===Purpose of Misplaced Pages=== | ||
| The purpose of Misplaced Pages is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for ], such as ], ], or publishing or promoting ] is prohibited. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good faith. | |||
| 1) {text of Proposed principle} | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
| :: | :: | ||
| === |
===Decorum=== | ||
| Misplaced Pages users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. In content disputes, editors should comment on the content and not the contributor. Personalising content disputes disrupts the ]-building process on which Misplaced Pages depends. Unseemly conduct, such as ], ] and ], is prohibited. | |||
| 2) {text of Proposed principle} | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | :'''Comment by others:''' | ||
| :: | :: | ||
| ===Controversial Issues=== | |||
| It is both difficult and necessary to provide ] encyclopedic coverage to controversial issues. For that reason it is even more important than on less controversial issues that editors respect each other and the rules of ] and work collaboratively. This mandate especially applies to editors who have strongly held views on issues. | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by parties:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | |||
| ::===Battlegrounds and bad blood=== | |||
| ]. Consequently, it is a not a venue for the furtherance of grudges and personal disputes. A history of bad blood, poor interactions and heated altercations between users can complicate attempts to reach consensus. Inflammatory accusations perpetuate disputes, poison the well of existing discussions, and disrupt the editing atmosphere. | |||
| ===Scope of ArbCom Proceedings=== | |||
| The Arbitration Committee does not, as a matter of policy and mission, decide good-faith article content disputes. However, when user conduct makes the resolution of content disputes difficult or impossible, the Arbitration Committee may impose appropriate remedies. | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by parties:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| === Proposed findings of fact === | === Proposed findings of fact === | ||
| ==== |
====Locus of dispute==== | ||
| The focus of this dispute is the article on ], which is a controversial topic in the ] and elsewhere. | |||
| 1) {text of proposed finding of fact} | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | ||
| Line 139: | Line 161: | ||
| :: | :: | ||
| ==== |
====Gaijin42==== | ||
| ] engaged in personal attacks. | |||
| 2) {text of proposed finding of fact} | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | ||
| Line 150: | Line 172: | ||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | :'''Comment by others:''' | ||
| :: | :: | ||
| ====Gaijin42==== | |||
| ] engaged in personal attacks. | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by parties:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| ===Proposed remedies=== | ===Proposed remedies=== | ||
| <small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small> | <small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small> | ||
| ==== |
====Discretionary Sanctions==== | ||
| Articles concerning ], broadly defined, are placed under standard ]. | |||
| 1) {text of proposed remedy} | |||
| :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | :'''Comment by Arbitrators:''' | ||
| Line 203: | Line 235: | ||
| :'''Comment by others:''' | :'''Comment by others:''' | ||
| :: | :: | ||
| ==Proposals by User:Example 2== | ==Proposals by User:Example 2== | ||
Revision as of 03:07, 6 January 2014
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
The purpose of the workshop is for the parties to the case, other interested members of the community, and members of the Arbitration Committee to post proposed components of the final decisions for review and comment. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions, which are the four types of proposals that can be included in the final decision. The workshop also includes a section (at the page-bottom) for analysis of the /Evidence, and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators and clerks may edit, for voting, clarification as well as implementation purposes.
Motions and requests by the parties
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed temporary injunctions
Template
1)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
3)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
4)
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Questions to the parties
- Arbitrators may ask questions of the parties in this section.
Proposed final decision
Proposals by Robert McClenon
Proposed principles
Purpose of Misplaced Pages
The purpose of Misplaced Pages is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for other purposes, such as advocacy or propaganda, furtherance of outside conflicts, or publishing or promoting original research is prohibited. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good faith.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Decorum
Misplaced Pages users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. In content disputes, editors should comment on the content and not the contributor. Personalising content disputes disrupts the consensus-building process on which Misplaced Pages depends. Unseemly conduct, such as personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith, is prohibited.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Controversial Issues
It is both difficult and necessary to provide neutral point of view encyclopedic coverage to controversial issues. For that reason it is even more important than on less controversial issues that editors respect each other and the rules of civility and work collaboratively. This mandate especially applies to editors who have strongly held views on issues.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
- ===Battlegrounds and bad blood===
Misplaced Pages is not a battleground. Consequently, it is a not a venue for the furtherance of grudges and personal disputes. A history of bad blood, poor interactions and heated altercations between users can complicate attempts to reach consensus. Inflammatory accusations perpetuate disputes, poison the well of existing discussions, and disrupt the editing atmosphere.
Scope of ArbCom Proceedings
The Arbitration Committee does not, as a matter of policy and mission, decide good-faith article content disputes. However, when user conduct makes the resolution of content disputes difficult or impossible, the Arbitration Committee may impose appropriate remedies.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Locus of dispute
The focus of this dispute is the article on gun control, which is a controversial topic in the United States and elsewhere.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Gaijin42
Gaijin42 engaged in personal attacks.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Gaijin42
AndyTheGrump engaged in personal attacks.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Discretionary Sanctions
Articles concerning control, broadly defined, are placed under standard Discretionary sanctions.
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Example 2
Proposed principles
Template
1) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposals by User:Example 3
Proposed principles
Template
1) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of Proposed principle}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed findings of fact
Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Proposed enforcement
Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
Template
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others:
General discussion
- Comment by Arbitrators:
- Comment by parties:
- Comment by others: