| Revision as of 01:04, 22 February 2014 editKoala15 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users132,324 edits →Frozen← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:41, 23 February 2014 edit undoTomStar81 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators36,080 edits →Re: Kung Fu Panda 2: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1,592: | Line 1,592: | ||
| :Oh i didn't even notice i was just trying to revert an edit. ] (]) 01:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | :Oh i didn't even notice i was just trying to revert an edit. ] (]) 01:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Kung Fu Panda 2 == | |||
| You undid my revision, which is fine, but I didn't see an official reason in the edit summary. By default, no explanation for a reverted edit equates to the edit in question being classified an act of vandalism, however I'm certain that this wasn't vandalism. I'm curious as to what your reason was for the revision though, hence the post. Note that I am not going to readd the material, I'd just like to hear back from you on this matter. | |||